Recent content by Fulcanelli

It could actually be a false positive. They didn't get DNA out of it and TMB only has a 50/50 correct hit rate, being highly prone to false positives. Was a confirmatory test on the sample done? There should have been enough material for one as well as a DNA test.

But they did change gloves, they just didn't film it.

Because nobody knows. All that is known is that Dr Stefanoni has stated that the crime scene examination/evidence collection complied with all Italian protocols while the lab work complied with the European protocols that her department uses. C & V (or any of the defence consultants) didn't seem...

I'm guessing (and it is a guess), that it was Luminol/TMB/DNA. The luminol being first is certain, because the purpose of that is to reveal invisible traces and you can't DNA or TMB test invisible traces unless you reveal them first. I'm guessing they used the TMB both in the hope of a...

So? Using FBI data for a specific reason is fine. It doesn't mean then that you are suddenly bound by their protocols. This is what C & V were doing, trying to impose American protocols on an Italian CSI department that has its own protocols. For some strange reason, you seem to think it does.

It's not right for C & V to impose 'standards' and 'protocols' from outside Europe on the ILE. Big difference.

I didn't know that! That's interesting.

And the police all stated otherwise on the stand. Amanda is also a known liar, which doesn't help. And...since her questioning began at midnight and she signed her statement at 1:45 am, I don't think an hour and forty five minutes is a long time for little precious to go without being presented...

there's a big difference between 'possible' and 'probable'. Space aliens and Bigfoot are also possible. I'm not really interested in possible.

10 - 100 fold more sensitive is a hell of a lot!

Not really, considering over half the luminol marks were the footprints which were laid down after Raffaele and Amanda had washed their feet and hence why the samples were so small (per massei). How could it be plant matter on the bottom of shoes when the footprints were barefoot? Is Lednev...

Shed hairs cannot be DNA tested, only hairs that have been 'pulled out' and you have the root.

For the third time. Perhaps third time lucky? It's reflected light from the flourescing of the luminol.

You have to open your eyes first.

Perhaps if you actually read my posts I won't have to answer points I've already answered. Curatolo never said he saw them FROM 9:30 UNTIL 11:30. He said he saw them AT 9:30 and AGAIN 'at' 11:30. In other words, he saw them twice, he wasn't observing them throughout the period in between, he was...