Recent content by Gavel Rash

https://images.app.goo.gl/Xu6Puqwg3qidtMPX6

So the only evidence of beef Wellington’s being cooked on same tray is from Erin herself? There is no evidence of that. And even if they had been presented that way the toxin itself was enclosed by pastry. I wonder if Erin could have heated hers separately, ie not been on tray but elsewhere and...

‘By Mikaela Ortolan During his evidence, Dr Sorell had identified that there were eight possible visits to the Loch postcode area based on phone data collected from one of Erin Patterson's handsets. These possible visits took place across March 2022, April 2022, August 2022 and February 2023.’...

Did they do a cavity search 👀???

Me thinks Mandy is merely the mouthpiece puppet of his charge. Making the story up to suit.

Yes! she emphatically stated she did not re taste the duxelle after adding the dried mushrooms

The narcissistic controlling tendencies Erin Patterson has displayed throughout this trial are indicative of the nature of the person. She had most certainly been undermining Simon to her children to become her flying monkeys, turning them against him, as her son described his father as being...

It’s telling, that in the entire time post lunch events, Erin never showed dismay or surprise or fear or concern at all when the idea of Death Caps was ever raised. Her instinct was to avoid any contact with those affected to the point where she showed nil regard to how they were faring, nor...

Yeah nice crossover gotcha. I had thought it had been a slip by the prosecution but hearing this today cemented the tactic as well inserted.

So in more obvious terms the two extra fillets in the freezer were the ones she cooked up for her kids, calling them ‘leftovers’ and in fact they were merely leftovers of ingredients not of the actual beef wellingtons. Erin’s capacity to be able to creatively obfuscate the narrative to enact...

And were they still in the freezer? Did the police check the fridge contents?

I’m curious as to why the prosecution has not asked Erin to possibly explain where Phone A in the pink case is as it hasn’t been found yet known to exist?

I find it extraordinary that every day of court there is a description of what the defendant is wearing! How this even in any way applicable or relevant to the proceedings or the interpretation of evidence is mind boggling.

This 🥺

Wow I’d almost say the prosecution is actually stumbling here. Specially by getting prime dates wrong and also filling in transcript to suit their accusations as opposed relevant clear gotchas. Erin’s ability to deflect every question with an answer that has possibility is quite intriguing