Recent content by greatminds

I don't like to point fingers, but maybe law enforcement in Salida just doesn't have a trusting or substantial relationship with the public, and that's why no one reached out earlier -- just imo.

Here's a link to the 1960 pages of discovery docs: Christopher Watts discovery file | Garage (Residential) | Bathroom

A question that can be added to your list is: "Why didn't SW, Bella, and CeCe have on pants?" The autopsy results indicate that all three had on just tops and underwear---not nightgowns---just tops: a butterfly top on Bella, a T-shirt for CeCe, and a T-shirt and bra for SW. No pants means all...

I agree, and sense there was a suppressed misogyny happening with CW. Misogyny brings to mind the pathos of other serial killers, such as Jack the Ripper, Ted Bundy, etc. Has there been any mention or concern expressed about whether CW had committed similar acts in the past?

d

They've probably reviewed it. Maybe they requested CW's palm prints to compare their size, shape to the compressed/damaged areas of the neck.

Does anyone put any stock into the theory that on CW's watch, something accidental happened to one of the girls, which threw CW into a tailspin of panic and shock?

Absolutely not.

The judge likely denied both parties' motions because he evaluated the probative value of swabbing the girls' necks for parental prints, against the prejudice this evidence could pose to either parent. In this case, either parent's prints could be on one or both girls' necks, as well as on...

I'm confused about what could be an important point. So, can someone clarify what is known about the "shrouded doll" photo posted on SW's FB page on August 9th? More specifically, is it known whether SW both took and posted the photo, or just posted the photo?

Yes - it mitigates the mens rea, or intent aspect of the crime, which can downgrade the charges, and hence, the sentence.