Recent content by HarleyP

It is to their advantage NOT to have Casey there. I doubt they can force her to be there either. IMO, Morgan & Morgan just say that stuff to stir the pot and make people angry. Attorney tricks that seem to be working.

Both sides responsible for the delay which benefits the Plaintiff ZG when you think about it. As far as Casey appearing, being forced to, she doesn't have to be there. She is the one being accused, not the accuser. She only has to answer questions if she chooses to use them as a defense and...

I'm sure you all are tired of seeing my posts. I'll shut up now. For now. LOL

Thank you. :blushing: I think that is not only "possible" but it's safe to say IT HAD TO HAVE happened (Cassidy & the Dog were drugged) for the state to prove it's case. LE said they took note of the hutch and suspected Cassidy was drugged but nothing was done about it. Why didn't they...

As someone who believes in our justice system, I couldn't agree more. Keep in mind that AT THIS TIME the SBI is investigating juror misconduct only as it relates to the alleged text messages. However, the defense attorneys will be appealing and IMO this is something that will be brought up in...

How many people make judgments about a person's guilt based on what they've seen on TV? I think it is terrible for a high profile TV personality to condemn someone before they've even been tried and that seems to happen on almost a daily basis anymore. I too miss the old court TV. They...

Moderators: I'm new & don't know all the how to's yet. I understand if someone wants to move a post or two of mine. I replied to posts in the thread but they strayed from the topic a bit. I have the hardest time finding my way around here & searching but I will get there. I hope :s

I too found it odd that in 9 hours neither Cassidy (or the Dog IIRC) didn't get into the blood. I wasn't sure how long they say he "had" available to be at the house and IDK about the washer at their house, but I can't wash & dry a load of clothes, even with both set on the speed cycle (and...

Their conscience to uphold the law and abide by their sworn OATH they wont to any of that and base their verdict only on what is presented to them in court, even if they have prior knowledge of the case. I don't think that is asking too much.

A beast in itself is so true. Call me old fashioned, but IMO FaceBook (and sites like it) are the worst things to ever come along. It is a breeding ground for all sorts of problematic things. It is a source for identity theives, con artists, child preditors, bullying, stalking and other crime...

I agree and have read where other people have similar thoughts on possible coincidence in wording. It's probably nothing, but even so, only good can come from a very very thorough investigation. Let's get rid of all suspicions about the verdict once and for all. It is crucial that jurors in...

Ok, I understand now. Ooops, sorry. Yes, sadly that is my fear too. If they're willing to do A, maybe they'd do B too. On it's face, the FB post seems relatively innocent and not influencing outcome. Even though there probably isn't anything to it, the mere fact the judge really downplayed it...

I am not about to get into a lengthy discussion, but what would you say if you knew they had virtually all of the evidence in the jury room with them? And you do understand that 'testimony' is evidence, yes? But, since you brought it up, I am curious: What specific evidence, in your opinion...

They aren't supposed to discuss the case or even 'consider' guilt or innocence until they have all the facts and officially go to deliberations. It's human nature to think about it during but there weren't votes until they went to deliberate.

First of all, this post is NOT directed specifically towards Elisa444, the poster I am quoting. I for one, if on the jury, couldn’t have convicted Jason Young of first degree, premeditated murder despite the voluminous circumstantial evidence or so-called "unacceptable level of coincidences,"...