So i already said I was going to watch the full 1 hour vid with an open mind, but from the couple 4 minute clips I've seen, I agree that she seems scared, but not of BL.
All of the things took time to happen. That's not really spontaneous. At any rate, it seems like if she is that terrified of him, the antagonistic nature of her actions would have registered at some point.
If a victim isn't going to spill the beans on their abuser because they would 'pay for it later', why would that victim, scratch, hit, leap through the window and create a public scene big enough for someone to call 911?
This is the part I'm struggling with. By the time she's talking to LE, she's already done all of the other things (hit him, scratched him, made a scene to the point that someone called 911) that, in your scenario, should have made him plenty angry. What's so much more egregious about telling...
I'd like to see a source for your belief on this, but regardless, hitting someone is not reasonable force to get a phone back.
Sure, but she can't commit a crime to get them back.
For the exact reasons i said. LE gets it wrong often enough that I'm not going to take any chances. Especially if I'm a doofus that knows enough to know I'm not great at answering questions under those circumstances.
The caller witnessed a scuffle. She admitted to assaulting him. He didn't offer that up until the cops started asking about his injuries. She denied he hit her. You can make that of that whatever you want, but he's still innocent in the eyes of the law, while she freely admitted to committing...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.