Recent content by Henwah

Hence why it is difficult to just remove it from the circumstances of the death itself, I.e. Something that would come to light that would incriminate them, enough that they felt obliged to assist - just my opinion of course

Well, because 4 other people chose to help dispose of a dead girl - there must be a fairly compelling reason for them to do that - personally speaking there is not a person on the planet I'd cover for if approached to do this, I realise we are all different but still

Wasn't supposed to be 'testy', sorry if it came across like that. I was just trying to say that any theory has to account for those people being 'happy' participants

You've overlooked a huge amount of things to arrive at that though, discounting the 5 people helping out isn't a simple thing - you wouldn't chop up/hide a human on a whim.. And why does that statement rule out prior 'dodginess'? If anything it implies they knew of reasons why someone might act...

'Victim blaming'? You are applying your emotions to what is a logic process - I have no judgment or interest in emotions or perceived characteristics, beyond how they may have affected the events that resulted in her being killed.. It's about trying to empathise with the circumstances in which...

Yes, isn't that the point of this forum? Some assumptions are more plausible than others

Because we have a scenario where a seemingly unplanned death resulted in a group of people deciding to help clear up.. There must be a pretty good reason.. We have another person who had enough reason to get herself charged with perverting the course of justice, but not assisting an offender...

What are you talking about? The point is that a perpetrator would react differently based on their belief as to whether a person would 'hold their tongue' in light of a discovery, and factors such as shyness might influence that. There is no judgement intended about the perception of her by her...

I'm sticking with the theory NM was involved in something dodgy with the Demetrius lot, and she stumbled across something, accidental death occurred but in circumstances NM needed to make go away, and involved the Demetrius's enough to make them help, and that SH and JP unwittingly got involved...

I think the point was they might respond differently to circumstances (e.g. Discovering drugs, other crimes etc), resulting in a response from a perpetrator .. Not that they were killed for being shy

Ah ok, but still - seems unlikely he'd do it there. The report said it needed 4 people to lift the object onto the van to take away so wouldn't have been a bin, probably a washing machine I'd think, perhaps there was evidence of some blood (perhaps prompting the 'time of the month' post)

Regarding motive - perhaps he'd gone back to Becky's house after taking mother to appointment (to steal something perhaps), thinking Becky was going to LO's house and would be out but she didn't go as LO was out. She walks in to find him doing something dodgy, argument ensues... Etc Edit- or...

So my guess would be that she died at her home, was dismembered at NM/SH's house (isn't that where the 'drum' objects were recovered from?), then taken to the Demetrius house. If NM was at beckys house earlier in the day (to take mum to hospital if I've got this right), perhaps it was he that...

I saw those posts too, the theory isn't implausible, though I can't see SP getting that riled up about the money unless it was hers or NM's

That implies only ugly people are murderers, that's almost as bad as the comments I read the other day essentially saying 'it can't be them, they look affluent'