Recent content by Homesteader

I agree with that too NW. I have enjoyed this board much and that's what made join. Discussing this with like minds may indeed help and at least educate us and it makes me use my brain again. I didn't mean to offend or lend a turf war. It just happens in every arena where there is people...

Just gut says to me that someone knew and may have been an unwilling accomplance at some point over the years.

Oh darn. OK so it was near his home where grave was found. Also I get what your saying about adrenaline. We once lifted a truck front off the head of an old man in a wreck. Just the two of us. I don't mean he needed physical help. The need is often to brag about the crime or have a passive...

Your exactly correct, that's what hubby said too. 26 years of experience he has, so I think this adds much. Also I had not been able to read the SW, wow that clears up a lot!

He would not have wanted evidence as a body on his property. He may think he can explain or deny knowledge of other items. Think of being a juror and looking at the body of evidence. Also, and to be delicate, the release of the bowels and so on, can point a lot. There are many chemical tests...

Yes, correct. She was found 100 feet, not yards, from her home, and was buried approx 2 miles away. To me that says he abducted her, took her home, later buried her and left clues elsewhere. But I am betting he was at that point angry, frustrated, panicked and deprived of his usual rituals. It...

Yes and thanks! Multiple long threads. And contradictions innocently. Trying to decifer exact facts. I think also that these SK's are sometimes given too much credit for mental facilities. Its true there are some, but I don't personally think he is one of them.

Probably left helmet and other items at scene when he came back to bury. Panic and quick canvas prevented him from his usual clean up. Just my opinions. I think there are many facts and clues we aren't privy too, for obvious reasons.

I'm sorry. I have all the threads, articles, and files, so I am at times overwhelmed. It is my understanding that the motorcycle was not found at scene, only the helmet?

If memory serves, rigor mortis begins about an hour and half afterr death, gradually loosens then further degradation begins. I could be wrong but that is what I have witnessed. Many times also, pardon here, but upon death and often a violent one, there are releases of the other bodily functions...

motorcycle was not at scene correct? Was rider of motorcycle ever identified? It was only helmet at scene correct?

Agree

Was DNA on motor bike or just helmet? This could have happened at his barn and placed later. ? This takes a lot of planning, and these people mostly just dont have the intelligence mostly to think like this and not under panic. Remember, they are going to do whatever their ritual has come to...

Possible but not probable as too much gear to carry and keep track of. Just my HO. Unless there was irrefutable evidence of a motorcycle, I would say he used a vehicle at all times, and prob had help.

His need to continue and not be caught would urge him to dispose of evidence elsewhere.