Recent content by hopingicanhelp

Yes and then there was the poor man whose DNA quickly ruled him out, but his home was swamped by media and 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 in the meantime. I remember being on the local boards, and people were fixated on Latino/Hispanic suspects (if not their violent, crazy ex or mean boss or anyone with first...

There is absolutely no evidence that his wife knew anything at the time. Hindsight? Yes. Her life was devastated by this. My understanding is that family life was complex, like a lot of us. He could be a great father and teacher, but they walked on eggshells at times, following his rules and...

There it is - queen of blackmail. I have to wonder what might have happened if Stanhope was able to win against her in court back in 2016.

In another time, I might have taken that statement at face value. Given the growing leaps taken and assumptions provided as verified news in an effort to be first, I remain skeptical. Add to that, AH is not here to defend or explain herself. We may never know. I am also unclear who made the...

Fentanyl was found in her system, but further testing was needed to determine whether it was administered in the hospital. As far as the cocaine, I would argue further testing is needed for that as well. One cannot assume that she was using cocaine the day of the accident without further...

And waiting lists are still huge. Kids in crisis are at the top of the triage list in my area, and there are so many. Intake appointments and screenings necessary to get the diagnoses, meds, treatment plans, etc, require a long wait. It doesn't matter if you have insurance and wealth. The system...

RSBM. Apologies to EB. Couldn't help myself.

While it might seem easier to deduct, it's probably kept separate in case one or both sides appeal. If JD appeals and wins, there is nothing to deduct!

Good! I was worried about a scenario in which she would file BK and then he would still be forced to pay her the $2 mil judgement as it might be considered an asset by the BK court.

I bet reporters through outlets like Law and Crime and also Court TV will post, but I'm not sure who because other cases have been going on. So I'm not sure if they'll travel there or if observers are allowed inside for this? If not, we'll probably just hear the final result of the payment...

Thanks for clearing that up! I wondered if that was ALL of the discovery or just exhibits as published in trial and I was understanding it was the latter so I haven't bothered looking through all of it yet.

I could be wrong but I kind of doubt it will be recorded because it's on a Friday and may fall under the "housekeeping" portion of proceedings rather than something the public can attend?

Love your new pic!

I'm not sure, but I think the parties could look at SM but not post anything until the trial was over...correct me if I'm wrong! I thought that was evident that after the week-long break, she and her team had "sudden recollections" that allowed her to attempt to make corrections on the stand...

I do wonder if in these interviews the subjects are given any editing authority. It wouldn't surprise me if a PR team demanded it...and did the best they could with it?