Recent content by iamkimba

I'm getting to this late, I've just felt sick, like someone hit me in the head and stomach simultaneously. I would say to the jurors: no one else stood up for and protected "that little girl". Why did I think YOU would? RIP Caylee. I'm so VERY sorry.

What a world! Oh, what a world!

Unless- and I really can't figure this out folks, I am so confused based on actions and reactions as to who knew what, when, why and how.. unless there was some fabrication on George's part when he helpfully told LE about the ladder, that he was somehow setting up an accident scenario, after...

ahem..well that would be me as well then- surfin' at work, cause I just can't stay away from the MADNESS!

To both: WHAT were you THINKING??!!

I just found it interesting that the commercial on the head of the WESH tv trial footage..was for the Amscot. as for Miss Casey- more fingernails in the eye to elicit tears I think. I thought maybe THIS time we'd get real tears and maybe real emotion, other than selfish self righteous anger...

But- if Mr Cain did not investigate fully, as he had several complaints made about him - about this very thing, then how can he be used as a "witness" to Kronk not finding the child's body? It seems you are taking someone that would himself be on the hotseat on cross examination, and are holding...

But the point is that the evidence we have seen is very compelling, though it is circumstantial. But in my view the more telling evidence..is the evidence we have not seen yet. How can you be so certain of your version of events, or the potential outcome, if you haven't got all the evidence...

Did the OP mean Richard Grund's writing? That is a mixture of printing and writing, and also has random capitalizations...see the cursive e..sometime's upper case, sometime's lower.

yeah- it figures..I'll be on vacation when it drops. Oh well- ya'll be sure to sift thru it and lay out the most interesting tidbits for me, okay?!

:crazy: ah the good old scissor and jar o' paste days! Good times...good times....

I think that, if Baez truly thought he could get this past the judge- with a faked document, then it was a deliberate tactic, to not notify the people involved. I think he grasps at straws, he uses what's available at the time, but I don't think he thinks things out, I don't think he is that...

My point was that people are saying it is a COPY of a physically cut and pasted document, and that is not necessary, when you can manipulate documents digitally.Of course, if it is manipulated, no original in the manipulated form exists. Many posters were saying that he deliberately showed up...

Wow.I made my way through this WHOLE thread. Very informative.And thanks to Tony for participating. But - I have a question, or maybe it's more of a comment over the whole fraudulent document thing. Why is everyone so sure that you could tell because it was cut and pasted. I'm sorry, but we live...

Depends..is it in the Fiction or Non Fiction section of the book store? j/k Nope nope and nope. Why pay money to read a book, when I can settle back, turn on the tube, and watch the fiction spout from their mouths for free?