My apologies if I’m doing something wrong by confirming what was said earlier in the thread. I don’t believe anyone is sleuthing anybody inappropriately. I didn’t see it mentioned here at all until the claimant did his YouTube interview. But if it’s against the rules I’m happy to not discuss it...
Glad this is being asked. Since the rules seem to be fairly fluid in this case, it would be nice to have some clarification in regards to being speculative of the "official" story. Kind of difficult to "sleuth" if you're not allowed to question where you feel questioning is due.
But hey, if...
This case just gets more confusing by the minute.
Especially reading all the "insider" information from people that allegedly know the family. I'm keeping up with threads elsewhere too and they all seem to contradict each other.
I do as well. Along with the entirety of Project Taken's website.
Missionary kidnappings are not common. Fear tactics and extensive "training" for hostile attacks among highly religious groups, however, is something often seen.
This kind of further convinces me that KP is possibly being caught between two different sources of advice. And he may trust the other more than LE due to being seen even slightly as a suspect in the beginning.
I think there are a couple of things that we can let go of (in my opinion, always)
1. Speculation about how long she was hospitalized. I questioned this heavily, but there are many logical accounts at this point for why she would have been released and why the length of time she was there...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.