Recent content by J. Lock

  1. J

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 #30

    Thank you. That's a relief. It would be awful to lose the potential info gathering that this civil suit may provide due to some statute of limitation violation. I really hope this brings the POIs to the table.
  2. J

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 #30

    How is the Spierer Complaint within the 2 year time limit? The actions complained of took place on June 3, 2011 and the Complaint appears to have been filed on June 20, 2013.
  3. J

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 #29

    If LS went there it would certainly explain JW's avoidance of a LE administered lie detector test. I also have always wondered why JW needed to get the key to LS's apartment from HT if he was simply checking to see if LS was there. If she was there, she could answer the door when he came over...
  4. J

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 #29

    If you accept JR 's story, for the sake of argument, and assume that LS left his apartment at 4:30 a.m., I always wondered whether LS would have walked to JW's house instead of returning to her place. If so, JW wouldn't have any movements to track.

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
64
Guests online
1,465
Total visitors
1,529

Forum statistics

Threads
646,342
Messages
18,858,255
Members
245,990
Latest member
yellowsweaterz
Top