Simply not true. The defense does not have to prove anything! Nothing at all. The State has the entire burden. The state MUST prove beyond a reasonable doubt the GZ did NOT act in Self Defense, and also that he acted in accordance with 2nd Degree Murder or Manslaughter.
IMO
I'm going to ask again, cause I'm just an impatient old lady! LOL!
Does anyone know the possible/probable sentences for 2nd Degree Murder vs Manslaughter? Are they the same? Each have a gun enhancement, and what is that in terms of additional years? Will the jury be aware of the possible...
I really hope you are wrong, also!
Can anyone tell me the sentencing structure for 2nd degree murder vs Manslaughter? Is there a difference? The gun enhancement adds years to each, correct? Thanks!
IMO!
The bottom line for me, is that I simply could not convict GZ of anything that he has been charged with. There is way to much reasonable doubt and way too little evidence. The State, IMO, has not proven that GZ did NOT act in Self Defense.
I keep hearing folks saying that a teenager was gunned...
I totally agree! If this animation & witness is allowed in by the judge, the State will completely tear him and the animation apart! IMO, this is not necessary for the Defense!
IMO!
Hope it's ok if I join this party! I haven't seen this one posted yet! I was in Junior High (I guess they call that Middle School now) and we would listen to this song over and over and scream out the line, "It's 4 O'clock in the morning, Damnit listen to me...". Oh, those were some great times...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.