Recent content by JiminWilton

I enjoyed your other novels much more, Mr. Grisham.

Reading the posts is a fascinating look into confirmation bias. Those of you who have predetermined guilt (as opposed to those who follow the innocent until proven line) disbelieve every witness who tends to raise doubt and blindly accept every word of those who support your belief. I've...

So CB saw what she saw but Gracie didn't see what she saw. I don't think we can have it both ways. When somebody testifies that they were hit by a car and their brains spilled on the pavement, it sure affects my assessment of credibility.

Why is this testimony not hearsay?

crickets? chirrrrrup.....chirrrrrup....chirrrrup

Y'all ain't from 'round here, is ya? The N&O can be....well...controversial on some topics. From a political point of view.

Why in the world would anybody stop reading the N&O? There must be a reason.

If they do, is it covered by insurance with no co-pay? Better be.

When I DVR something and the inevitable car or foot chase breaks out, I skip forward to the capture. So, instead of cutting to the chase, can we please cut to the capture?

I just can't resist. Only if they're wearing a hula skirt.

Well, I think it's pretty apparent that if you beat the dickens out of somebody with some hard object they may die. Do you really think Jason was researching how hard and how many blows were needed to kill somebody? This whole search with no idea of the dates is a canard.

I'll highlight the "you indicated that" if a third volunteer will do the "with regard to" Might take a month and a dozen or so highlighters, though.

Becky, when the field done been plowed you don't need to crawl back on the tractor.

Except for the ...ummm... and "with regard to" and "you indicated" phrasing, there's not much I get from her form.

Okay HC, let's ask every question the DT asked all over again expecting a different response. Every question the DT asked, got it?