Recent content by JLZ

I don't have kids so perhaps that's why I don't understand. What exactly is the risk of a child waking up in the morning? It's what people are supposed to do.

You have a table with quantities and a line that says "total" at the bottom, there's a strong expectation that the quantities add to the total. Either there is an intention to deceive or police forgot that sometimes AI can't count.

Looking at that list again, the detections actually total to 22,958, not 23,304 as stated. I'd say there must be another page somewhere, but the exclusion has to be deliberate filtering because the list is sorted by quantity most to least.

Was it said what the category "detections of interest" meant? Does it mean that something living or recently deceased was detected but the program can't determine what type of animal? Or is it a tactful expression for "potential remains of a child", each instance of which would warrant...

I find it a bit too clear-cut to be convincing. AI is notorious for making confident claims that simply aren't true. I would like to know what error-levels pertain to the general process, and also in this case how much on-ground checking has been done of the AI-identifications. Assuming there...

One could also argue the converse. There are always going to be inconsistencies in recollections of a real event; whereas consistency may be a sign of collaboration, invention, cover-up.

I need to know what the discrepancies are. I'm through with taking police suspicions on trust. They can talk specifics or charge someone, and then I'll see what I think.

Thank you. I could only find really general reports about the legislation.

Yes, but not at the time Gus was said to have disappeared. (I wonder though how anyone can be certain that nobody arrived and departed unseen by Shannon.)

There you go. So it's a fair guess that the family didn't consent to the January search/es. And they didn't consent because the searches weren't for Gus himself, but for evidence potentially against the family.

I haven't been able to find out when that new law became effective. Perhaps passed in November but not effective until 2026? Does anyone know?

Another thing in the scenario that Gus died the night before that feels strange to me, is that Jess headed out in the morning without seeing him to say Goodbye, see you at dinner time, be good for Shannon. Even if he was still in bed--and small kids are often the first ones to wake and start...

Do we know the date/time of the images? When you say the interesting thing is that there was only one human, are you implying that the image is from the day of the disappearance?

The lawyers have no independent knowledge of what happened. They can't assume that Josie and Shannon's interests are identical. Therefore it would not be professionally ethical for the same lawyer to act for both of them in relation to Gus's disappearance/death.

That's all right, but if they're talking to the person of interest, they need to mark the moment the person becomes a suspect, and tell him his rights. Failure to do so will make the interview and perhaps its fruits inadmissible as evidence. If police have told a judge that somebody is a...