Not sure if these observations are coming from the video only, if so I have thought he may have injured himself walking around in the dark or breaking the motion lights. But if you see these injuries in the still pic an injury the night of the abduction does not fit.
Does this mean that nothing was found in the Range Rover? Does this mean they don’t have any suspects? Is the mixed DNA the only one that holds any clues? Will this be something that the sheriff comes out and disputes later on like so many other things we’ve heard? Sorry I’m just panicking out loud.
Looking at a photo of a bite light almost triggers my gag reflex. Seems like it would be awkward and uncomfortable to keep in your mouth for more than a few minutes. If this person was in the house for as long as 40 minutes would he keep it in his mouth the whole time? His hands look to be so...
I am so curious about this pic. Did Le remove the gun and backpack so viewers can get a sense of his body type? Does he approach without the backpack at some point? Is the gun under his jacket? It does look like something rectangular is in his right pocket.
And no holes in the ski mask????
Imo we should report a post that is a violation of the rules here. Every time you reply to that post or quote is it another one mods have to deal with.
Report and move on is what I do.
Don’t anyone read this and think it’s true. I’m just asking because I want clarity. Am I understanding that the glove DNA was not in codis but they haven’t said the DNA from inside the house is not in codis is that correct?
Again, I don’t know that this is true just looking to understand.
The dna from the glove can not be entered into CODIS right away but can it be compared to the dna samples the lab has already right away? The samples from family and house staff.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.