Recent content by Kasabel

Could be but I can't see him being just as thin as what I see the cyclist to be. His legs were really skinny (I believe it to be a man not a woman like some have suggested). I could be wrong but I'm not getting the right impression that he could be the cyclist. It keeps reverting back to...

I think he is too heavy to be he cyclist. The cyclist was tall, thin and rangy. He is quite heavyset.

Is there actually accurate data on times (distinguished from timeline which can be used as meaning of order of events)? As regards the mast areas I referred back to a post that someone took time to create many threads ago. I am not designing to be completely accurate on times. And I am...

This is good as it narrows down the possibilities which are innumerable had C and his phone been separated. I would safely go with this theory on the basis that 1) this is being stated as the most plausible theory by experts and 2) the alternative gives too many options which would result in...

I've just checked back on various msm sources all of which agree that C enters HS approx 0325, bin lorry enters and collects approx 40 mins later therefore it is within timeframe for reaching BM around the time of the phone pings.

True that! I didn't notice this anomoly in the timeline! Or it could be the confusing of times and information being presented differently between Media sources which explains this as it seemed pretty determinate that the time/distance of travel was associated with the same as bin lorry. If...

It may not be that it was constantly travelling. The pings only verify the space of time between them. If it was a vehicle it could have made stops which would have also filled time in order that the space of travel is met at more reasonable speed but with 1 or more stops which used time. If...

That last point should read "all 3 of which cover either scenario of either animate or inanimate"

Therefore, if it is assumed that C travelled with his phone then he was for all intents and purposes in BSE for just over an hour after last sighting on cctv. if C was not with his phone leaves the result that it was lost/disposed of and ended up travelling on its own in a vehicle. If the...

Edit: Also add that there is no reason that it is necessarily the bin lorry the phone left with - if it wasn't with C and travelled without him it could have travelled by vehicle which matches direction and velocity of bin lorry provided that the direction is covered by the phone pings (I.e...

Due to the bin lorry being the first vehicle entering HS at 4.20 and the phone seems to travel directionally and with the same speed as bin lorry this would mean that C would have had to have been in/around BSE until the phone starts to move which is over an hour later from when he entered HS...

In what way does stating that if the police have evidence of this then I'm sure they are following second guess anything? And when have I ever mentioned the military??!!! You are talking absolute nonsense JamesKing.

Purely speculation then I would say that 4 mins is more than enough time to incapacitate someone and bundle them into the back of a car which then drives the wrong way out up a one way street. More than enough time. Or is lurker a look out for whoever is in horseshoe with Corrie? Is that...

Because I am not guessing who he is. I am identifying a person of interest and being specific about the reasons I believe this person to be of interest. You can only follow a line of inquiry based on linear projections. To get from A to C you must go through B.......Did he leave in a car? I...

I would think the 3 were identified on the basis of the cctv footage as here were many comments under that thread of 'isn't that such and such'. This is what I am supposing. On the same front we could also suppose that running man and lurker have also been identified as we aren't being told...