It is interesting that they have blurred out the driver side in the CCTV footage. If the person believed to be driving the car is the person currently in custody, why would they be inclined to blur the footage?
I suspect they are trying to figure out what the mother was doing during the 2-3...
He was a month off turning 10, not 8.
Have you ever read about the James Bulger case? Children can cause horrific (intentional) injuries to other children.
Well, obv. But you could make the same argument about any criminal before they're caught.
The fact that he made steps to remove his fingerprints points fairly strongly to the idea that he was running from the law.
I would think that if someone innocently gave him a lift and harm came to him afterwards, that that person would come forward and let them know where he was dropped off.
Does anyone really believe that he's still alive? I don't understand the arguments for going AWOL. Is there any previous indication that he'd do something like this? Anything that would suggest that he's still alive but is choosing to stay missing?
IMO, it's unlikely. I can't see the two distinct moles in Maria's photos (poor quality, admittedly). But the bigger thing is that Maria had apparently been pregnant before, and the autopsy performed on SC Jane determined that she had never been pregnant.
My thoughts on the interview:
1. We got no real answers, and a whole lot more questions.
2. There are 101 things that still don't add up.
3. The over emotional things (like tucking a blanket in and pretending it was her child :thinking:) didn't sit right with me, nor did KP referring only to...
The same sophisticated abductors who violently abducted someone from a public area? The same sophisticated abductors who use hose clamps and brand someone with a possibly identifiable mark? Who returned her to a public area, that could've easily been witnessed by others?
Not buying it. If...
If the cellphone was planted by the perpetrator, as has been suggested, there'd be DNA and fingerprints on it that don't match Sherri or anyone else who'd have contact with her phone. But I'm venturing a guess they'll find no such evidence.
KP's not doing her any favours by shouting from the rooftops about her injuries etc. It doesn't "defend her honour" (whatever that means), it compromises the investigation and means that securing a conviction, if anyone is ever arrested, will be infinitely more difficult.
There's a reason LE...
Also, let's be real. If she had gotten down to just 87lb, there's no way she wouldn't have been severely dehydrated, and she would have been admitted to hospital for fluids, rather than not admitted and released after a once-over. KP's statements don't match up to the facts.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.