Recent content by LetThemEatCake

where do we discuss this case?

is there a link to the report?

thank you!

I don't know where I read it but apparently there were indications that he was planning "not to come back" or something, that a possible killing spree was in order. His profile may be too clichéd, I'm starting to believe his first victim was the one who shot him.

She knows absolutely nothing of course.

exactly, they disputed none of that and expected tape evidence and Dr. G's testimony to hold without any hammering to a jury of mentally challenged imbeciles. He is completely guilty of effing this up.

SAO?? His prosecution was bad, as I said he didn't refute almost any of the defense's claims, which had to be done regardless of how outlandish they were.

Just goes to show how bad Jeff Ashton is. After watching the BRILLIANT dissection of the OJ Trial by Vincent Bugliosi I've come to the conclusion that when so much evidence still results in an acquittal it is the fault of the prosecution. For instance they never called back Dr. G to refute all...

Jeff Ashton should have prosecuted Cindy for perjury.

@teatime what you say is ********. I saw the trial and prosecution proved first degree murder beyond any reasonable doubt. The problem in this world is that most minds are NOT reasonable.

that's strange, weren't they old enough to strap themselves? Also, I wonder what her motive was. What could have happened for her to enact such revenge?

I agree, it was so obvious to me, but even the nieces' family and the family of the over victims went with the alcoholic angle, why?

did you call the fbi hotline?

That would make LISK around 50 now, I doubt it is him.

http://www.watchfree.to/tv-270331-On-the-Case-with-Paula-Zahn-tv-show-online-free-putlocker.html/season-14-episode-3 watching it right now, hopefully this won't be the e true hollywood story of michelle mcnamara,.