Then I wonder where she was going without her glasses on. I suspect she wouldn't be visiting someone or going to the roof to explore around, if she can't see, why wander around? There is nothing to eat in the hotel, why go to the kitchen and even at a longer distance (kitchen on the 14th floor)?
Would you dare to walk around in a hotel you're not familiar with during midnight without your glasses on? If not, that should have proved that she was sleepwalking.
Then she must had contacts on those photos. If she had contacts instead of glasses on the way she came to 14 floor, why dip down to look at the elevator panel?
Well that means she had such a bad vision and couldn't live without her glasses on. Then why went to unusual places without her...
She came from her room on the 4th floor why went up to 14 and mixed it up with her floor?
If that was the case, then it could be very easy to find out the killer, just compare the location of her room on the 4th floor with the one on 14th.
Still, there was no evidence that she was killed...
100% agree
I'm curious to know where her glasses were. I think it is crucial to know and it would give us hints where she was coming from and what she was doing. I'm certain she came from her room and probably was asleep or in an altered state. Unless she had lost her glasses and they had...
Then why she had to stoop down to look carefully at the panel for her floor if she had contacts.
Name a situation that you do not wear glasses other than showering and sleeping. I can't think of any at this point.
This is something I want to point out. The reason she had no glasses on was because she was asleep and then woke up for dream walking. You don't wear your glasses when you go to bed do you? I really don't think anyone would take off their glasses going to places that they have no experience...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.