Recent content by Mama2JML

I believe there is evidence to indicate the victim was strangled prior to the head blow, more than once, & that the ligature was violently tightened bringing her close to death when the head blow was delivered as a coup de grace. 1. I don't know when/how/why the suitcase was utilized, or even...

Most IDIs don't believe the victim was dead before the head blow was inflicted. Some IDIs believe the flashlight was the instrument used. Others believe it was the baseball bat. Some lean toward other options. Opinions vary. Regarding the intruder's exit, the butler's pantry door seems the most...

No, that's not what AK is saying at all. Have you seen Chris Wolf's handwriting? Is it identical to Patsy's? What about Bill McReynolds'? ...Mervin Pugh's? Oh, the irony... :sigh: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Good news! Explain away...

We don't know how the evidentiary DNA would have affected the GJ's decision, but does it matter? Probable cause to charge someone doesn't nearly equate to that someone's guilt. Reasonable doubt exists for very good reasons. Can you imagine how many innocent people would be wrongfully convicted...

BBM You're right, the evidentiary DNA doesn't "disqualify" or "negate" any other evidence. Who is disputing that?... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am really struggling to understand your argument. All cells are small, regardless of origin. The CODIS profile was obtained 5 years prior to the two matching DNA profiles obtained via touch collection methods in 2008...

You raise good points. Why would the Ramseys have lied about Burke being asleep? The events immediately following B's known wakefulness, contradict any reason to lie. SO... Did the Ramseys lie about Burke being asleep?... Perhaps LE leaked this (mis)information to the MSM in support of...

Kolar's interpretation of Lacy's statement differs from mine. It is not an exoneration, IMO. She took a stance, unpopular among LEOs in the BPD, but that's hardly an embarrassment. ...especially considering this case has received an abundant supply of 'embarrassing' statements, moments, actions...

Mary Lacy's public statement, 07.09.08: (B&UBM) On December 25-26, 1996, JonBenet Ramsey was murdered in the home where she lived with her mother, father and brother. Despite a long and intensive investigation, the death of JonBenet remains unsolved. The murder has received unprecedented...

DNA is DNA, regardless of the origin. ...unless you're referring to mitochondrial DNA which obviously doesn't apply to the samples collected from the victim's fingernails, panties, and longjohns. No, b/c the four (or five) of 7 markers sample was collected before CODIS, & before STR analysis...

I'm not following you. Explain?... AND, (according to Kolar) JonBenét could not be excluded as a contributor to the female sample, so that leaves 5 foreign DNA samples. All male, non-Ramsey; Potentially from the same individual b/c the samples analyzed in 1997 can't be compared to those...

..."the other five touch-dna samples"? I think you're mistaken. To which samples are you referring?

RSBM You do realize this statement applies only to those samples collected & tested in 1997, as outlined in the report you've cited, right? The CODIS sample is not a mixture. This forensic profile, found in at least three incriminating locations, belongs to one unknown, (non-Ramsey) male.

These photos were taken at the same pageant, and each depicts the same bruise on JonBenét's arm: ...& one need not be a great reader to excel in math.