Recent content by MaybeNotToday

You're kidding right? This is a very poorly "blended" family whose youngest child is in intensive care while in the care of the father's live-in girlfriend, and you're worried about polite society? That shipped sailed a long way back. The FAMILY needed answers that they just were not...

So, what is the meaning behind all this insurance policy talk? Are you all still trying to figure out how she can afford her defense? And if so, why?

Anyway, what I'm wondering now is: (1) if the interrogatories were duplicative enough to become so burdensome, why didn't they respond with "see answer to Interrogatory # 3". I've seen that done in other cases as questions do have a natural tendency to overlap. That would take no time. Answer it...

That's an unsigned proposed order. I think lawyers can draft that up for the Judge to sign if agreed.

I just want to say thank you in advance to AZ Lawyer for taking the time to sift through and answer all of our questions.

The detective is wearing an ill fitting blazer. It happens to the best of us.

Hi Lash I just read Dina's motion to compel them to answer and makes sense to me (but obviously judge disagrees). Every interrogatory directly correlates with every allegation the Zahaus made in complaint. It reminds me of this site. We have to back up statements of facts with some...

So, I guess instead of answering plaintiff's interrog just plainly, Dina challenged each allegation?? And that is a no no at this stage of proceedings. Am I getting that right?

Wow! What a coincidence! A friend of mine also drove past Spreckles that morning around 11am . . . She is certain that she didn't see Dina coming out of the mansion.

I think it's ironic that the Zahaus team found this annoying seeing as how the defendants had keep responding to invalid complaints. Wasn't one even in the wrong court? There was a bit of a handholding to get to this final complaint so I don't know why the defense didn't file sanctions or for a...

I remember when these pictures were released. Everyone was getting out their microscopes - analyzing body shapes. It's obvious to me it's the detective, she's even got the bag hanging on her shoulder

The poster is asking you if you still think it's Dina and not the detective.

If they settled it, they'd be saying they were responsible for Rebecca's death (and all the other, IMO, ridiculous allegations alleged within the complaint). Why wouldn't ANY innocent person fight with all they had against allegations such as those?

It's like the Wild West up in here.

Do the Zahaus know what she was wearing that day to know they are "missing"? The clothes Ann Rule described were small and women's don't forget those little details. And if she was ambushed in the shower as you speculate, then why are "missing" clothes an issue?