Maybe someone desperate to make a case when there isn't one. I don't why they would do it but it happens. It sure looks they they created facts in this instance to try to make a case in the absense of one. Further it appears they removed facts when it did not fit their theory (ie., wiped cell...
That guy is not really FBI and I don't understand why some think the FBI is impeachable. They have had their share of controversies. Also whoever said JW wanted to be in the FBI? That so called FBI guy didn't have much experience examining computers anyway and had poor explanations for the...
It could also be that they are 10-2 or 11-1 NG and they are trying to convince the hold outs to remove their BDI glasses. There's really no way to know for sure.
The Windows System log thing about a duplicate IP on the LAN was nothing more than a ruse by the prosecution. There was some mention of it on Friday but when it came time to put the cards on the table the prosecution folded. It was never presented as evidence. There was no such log entry or...
I am quite sure that it wasn't the baliff and Brad didn't have to accuse anyone. That the phone was tampered with is a fact and the evidence is clear and irrefutable to anyone that understands the underlying technical details.
One of the defense experts testified that it was still communicating with the tower and therefore still had all of it's info on it - then sometime later it was erased. This was after the phone was erased.
You probably do have corrupt files and files with incorrect time stamps but I bet you don't have a group of .cur files and image files that were the result of a google maps search with identical time stamps down to the micro-second. The identical time stamp is what makes the files look like...
Concerning the Cell phone wipe -- I am not so sure it was done due to technical incompetence. How intelligent does one have to be to not enter the same wrong code 10X especially when you are explicitly warned that the phone will be erased if you enter the wrong code again. Also there is the...
No I am not saying that the FBI guy did it or the DA's office. The FBI guy didn't impress me in the slightest. He obviously ignored the identical time stamps. It would most likely had to have been done during the 27 hours it was powered up at the Cooper's house which would imply that someone...
I realize that the jury didn't hear the defense computer forensics expert but we did. His testimony about identical timestamps on all of the files related to the alledged google search is rather clear and damning because if the search was legitimate there is no way that could happen. I believe...
I think you are probably right. Even though Kurtz's opening statement was very long the trial IMO has played out almost to the letter as he stated it would. He did an excellent job of discrediting the states flimsy evidence during his case in chief and did it very expediously. He should have...
Not Guilty - This should have never gone to trial. I have never seen such a poor investigation or such a poorly presented case. The bias displayed by the judge is criminal IMO. It boggles my mind how a reasonable person could possibly convict the defendent in this case.
What underhanded tactic are you referring to? The defense presented evidence and I don't understand why some don't realize that both sides scrutinized the image with the best tools available and they both came to the conclusion that it is not there. There would only be 1 reason for this and...