Recent content by Mimi82

Yes that’s true but in court they are referred to by their names it’s just the reporters who have to identify them with letters & the parents and all involved will know this.

I thought the same but, I question my initial thoughts to evidence such as this because I find it difficult to state anything about what it means when there is so little being released without further context. Knowing somebody well & how they text would allow a person to make a reasonable...

The 6 month time frame is approximate. When another baby’s evidence is heard & a witness/expert testifies, Myers is allowed to cross each and every one. I’m suggesting that Myers might wait for whatever the witness/ expert testifies on another baby until he points out something about a past one...

Or they are waiting to cross examine the witness at a later stage because the same experts in some cases are called up more than once to discuss another baby? So, maybe the next baby she is accused of poisoning with insulin is when the defence will challenge it?

They have to disclose it too before the trial begins but they don’t have to mention anything in a particular order do they? For example, the defence, Myers, might be waiting to bring up something relevant to a baby at this stage at a later stage because it’s relevant to a baby not discussed yet...

Yes, similarly I see the evidence today as the strongest so far that somebody purposely harmed a baby & I imagine there will be more to come. The defence said he wasn’t going to challenge DR Gibbs on his evidence on this child today but he said he’d come this later, I think? Didn’t defence...