Recent content by nastasya

Suppose the judge is even teetering on which way to go... believe OP or the 5-ear witnesses. Then the assessors bring up some other evidence, like... "Hmmm.... what about the blood on the duvet and carpeting where the accused dropped the jeans?" "And yes, what about the bashed on...

OP admitted to killing Reeva. The purpose of the trial was for OP to present a case that would explain how the admitted killing of the victim was not a violation of SA murder laws. OP has been afforded ample opportunity to present his case. He has changed his explanation from saying he...

This is another sad diversion. He hasn't been found guilty yet in court. True. What he has done is confess to grabbing a loaded 9 MM Parebellem, and then walking down two passages into another room to fire the gun at them, putting a bullet through the victim's brain. So that makes him an...

The thought that OP should be angry, even if his story is true, is pathetic. The dumbass shot four times through a toilet door two minutes after his girlfriend was awake in bed beside him, asking him whether he was able to sleep. Of course people have a right to be angry about anything...

Well since OP was 100% responsible for creating those crime scenes, I would think it would be irresponsible and unprofessional for the evaluators NOT to show OP what he did and observe his reactions.

I think it's more because some women have some unresolved conflicts and jealousy issues around attractive models like Reeva, and are unconsciously happy she was at the other end of the shots. That's what I see when I look at the women who fall all over themselves defending OP, referring to...

Another pathetic accusation against Nel. OP lies and Nel is accused of harming him by pointing out that he lied. Harm is what OP did when he put the bullet through Reeva's forehead.

Please explain how asking questions can harm somebody. This should be fun. :popcorn: The only person in this entire situation who harmed anybody was Pisotorius, the killer, when he shot Reeva.

Nel just got the cake and is able to eat it too. He has an expert and OP both testifying it's because of his personality that he committed the murder, and now he will have a cadre of expert reports to support the murder charge, AND that say he is not suffering from any diminished capacity...

And in this case OP provided a detailed confession to the killing. Reeva was not attacking him. He was in no danger. She did not lose her life through any legal means. Standing over her dead body, OP declared his justification for killing her. Now he is obligated in the court of law to...

hahahaha... of course he had the presence of mind to bash in the left side of the bedroom door on the way back up the stairs, anticipating how that would make it easier to carry Reeva downstairs even though the right side of the door was already open. And he had the presence of mind to yell...

Actually, that's not true. He's confessed to killing the victim. It's called a prima facie case. OP now has burden of proof to show the killing was not a violation of SA criminal code. He's failing miserably so far. His most recent witness just completed testimony explaining in her...

You're right. He's not a murderer until convicted. For now he's just a killer.

Your description itself displays the convoluted and non-sensical explanation given by the killer. If he had the ability to aggressively pursue the "intruder" he also had the ability to flee as well. The killer moved towards the victim. The victim moved from the bathroom, away from the...

Um... yeah.... hearing noises and reaching for guns to go on attack mode is why he was arrested in charged with murder. Just because you're on stumps doesn't mean you can go commando and shoot at unarmed imaginary intruders you've told to leave your house. Let's come back to the other side...