Recent content by piedmontmom

I could almost laugh if it weren't so true. I have friends through my childrens school that live in M. Youngs neighborhood. What got me so involved with this case is that one of my children frequently walks the lake area in Lochmere and before NC was found I was concerned for the kids safety. We...

Oh I agree with you too. I'm just thinking I don't recall a case that has been in the news this much locally, ICR, I don't even think the Michelle Young case was covered in the general news as much. I know it was covered here but was in the general media as much. I don't think there was as much...

I've been thinking they'll ask for that anyway...he's already been slandered in the entire subdivision and this part of town. :waitasec:

First he implied that he was busy with another trial at the moment, suggesting it wouldn't be today. Then someone (off camera made a comment), he laughed and said...ok he'd see what he could do. Then...camera was left on him for a time bit as the room emptied, he sighed loudly as he was...

ITA--thinking there will not be a local trial and we'll see a change in venue other than Wake County.

Sorry, I meant the hearing was becoming more interesting in general. Didn't mean because it could be related to knightdale. This is a neighboring town and at first I thought their LE was somehow involved, as I had mentioned the hearing was "slow" going imho up to this time.

I too think he will leave them sealed but he seems to be intrigued by the interesting argument...both representing the publics concern. His response should be interesting in terms of his phrasing. ETA...don't think he's happy this is on his docket

theyre also concerned about the timing involved...sealing before SW were even issued. 1st amendment vs. 4th amendment concerns. judge just said it's an interesting argument with both representing the publics concerns but from different view points. he says hes busy with another trial at...

thanks mt3k--i had phased out...it was a bit dry, slow and redundant...then I heard knightdale. much more interesting now.

thanks d99...i was falling asleep, some of those points were repetative AND slow in coming...was a bit mind numbing.

I'll ask again, especially for mto3...did the judge mention knightdale police dept? what did that mean? also---the state just commented the SW should remained sealed to prevent bias from future witness when they go to trial....does anyone think there would be a change in venue?

did the judge just refer to knightdale police dept??? why???

Regarding BC's feel for the public eye. The kind of media exposure, where every "Joe Schmo or Jane Doe" sees it at headline news, morning and night, the kind with news vans, interviews etc is very different from his adventures blog. IMHO. Wasn't it BC that asked that they black out their...

Oh yeah, I wasn't I figured that was it. Thanks for the encouragement. It did however give me time to see that I think there is a poster here and on the city data thread mentioned that is the exact same person. The post was almost verbatim...hmmm...the one about 3 sides to a story.

I have seen runners on Holly Springs Road up towards that area where it does flatten out a bit and is less curvy, from Lilly Atkinsson Drive (or whatever that is called) it is a very short jaunt to the entrance of that neigbhorhood where she was found. True, not that many and more biker than...