oh i agree -- the evidence is clearly much stronger in the 2005 case. but the dna link itself is not enough to extrapolate guilt in the other two cases, at least not yet. (though i do think he is clearly guilty, that is just my opinion)
there's always the possibility of an alford plea (see link here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alford_plea) i'm not sure if this would be on the table for JLM (if anybody knows, i would be interested!) -- i remember that that such a plea was taken in the annie le murder case a few years ago.
thank you for this post -- it's very important to keep this in mind. dna is not itself conclusive proof of anything but contact. it can certainly be the smoking gun in a case, but dna itself is not proof of a crime necessarily. hopefully they have enough, in all three cases, to prove guilt...
the police have been clear in saying that hannah was not at that intersection when she sent the 'lost' text. is there something i'm missing? or are you just showing the intersection? respectfully.
https://twitter.com/CBS19/status/525748304353968128
#BREAKING: Albemarle County Police have identified the human remains are of missing UVA student #HannahGraham.
there's a photo on this comment thread: https://www.facebook.com/FindHannahGraham/posts/715319478538303
because i can't see his photos, i can't say this is 100% his dog, apologies to mods if this goes against the rules.
it's possible that his family was afraid of him too, and his sister gave him the car to avoid a confrontation. or that he lied and said he needed the car for a different reason (since his was with the police). there's no way to know, and i just don't think we have enough information to speculate...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.