Plus she had the two psych evals done pretrial when they wanted the psychologist to testify to the abuse. Ashton's response said no diagnosis of any mental issues in those evals.
Plus the two evals she had when she went to jail.
Let's see.......could that be a LIE?? Did it come from an...
I hope the SA emphasizes the number of people she TORTURED with her lies and manipulations - including the jury. I thought for the longest time that her family begging for her life would save her from death, but her family lost all of their good will with their own lies. She stands alone -...
Casey is getting credit for the time she is sitting in jail and that time will be credited to any eventual sentence (except death or LWOP).
Usually, jail time earns extra credit....like 2 days credit for 1 day served, or even three days credit.
Does anyone know how much time she has...
Not only that she "did not like to judge", but not much info was elicited about her personally (Ashton thought she was gone with the judging comment).
She did indicate, IIRC, that she lived alone, didn't have friends, played farmville a lot and only watched westerns on TV. People who are...
until Friday afternoon. Juries seem to always come back on Friday afternoon....late.
I also predict that juror number 4 will be a big problem and complain to the judge that she is being intimidated.....
MOO
I agree exactly. This is the judge's making by letting them stomp around this issue at all. I don't think being "never overturned" is such a great thing. Maybe he is too cautious to the detriment of one side or the other.
The rules are the rules.
IMO, this is far from mistrial...
The problem with this testimony is that Dr. Logan is not an expert (and was not accepted as one by the court) on the issue of laboratory qualifications or operations. Or anything except forensic toxicology. Lawyer Sims knew this, but instead of keeping her questions in this area, she...
This is just so infuriating. this is part of her craft. She is not a rookie who does not know how to do this. They are just deliberately going ahead and using him for things the court said he was not qualified to testify to. And they do not care about the rules, or craft, or skill or...
OK, this is complicated, but here is what I think the issue is:
The defense does not have to prove anything (As CM frequently points out). So JA wanted the judge to "take judicial notice" (tell the jury) that JB got to send evidence to a US lab and chose not to send the duct tape. BUT that...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.