Recent content by rob525

Ok. Whatever.

11:45 is still early enough to get across the bridge to NJ (particularly if one is worried about DUI check points) and hit another stop before getting to DIs house.

OK. That is your theory. No one knows what happened so, to date, there are only theories and the in the water theory, to me has the least amount of holes in it.

When I say people I mean in their car. Yes. it has happened. But I am done debating.

THer have been numerous instances where people have went into the water and signs were missed. Even obvious ones. There have even been instances wher ethe barriers were repaired and noone checked the water.

Historical weather that i see says light snow in the days that followed with heavy snow on the 28th. So, depending upon when folks got out and started checking potential locations.

Agree, outside of the city would be more likely. However, how long would those traces remain? If it takes days or weeks for folks to start looking at roadways and potential spots, the traces may have been gone or ignored. I wonder what the weather was like in the days immediately after they were...

If it was a random crime then the witness idea makes some sense.

The meet up in Philly was in and of itself a spur of the moment thing from what I have read. It was a chance phone call earlier in the afternoon that led to a met up later. Danielles husband would have likely not known that they were together ( and who else would have motive to harm both of...

Detective Perspective is covering this case and I have read up on it previously. The only question I have regarding the suicide theory is: Why the explosion /fire? If you are going to kill yourself, why do all that? Perhaps he either wanted to make sure that authorities were alerted right away...

Probably quite as you suggest. Perhaps the gun shot was to insure that Mary was indeed dead, maybe he thought she was still alive on his way out and decided to fire the shot? Or, there is something symbolic in shooting her? Wnted to kill the children so that when he shot his wife, they would not...

How do you know this isn't part of a larger plan that is still being investigated? I f this does involve the UAPs, nuclear programs, transparency, and whistleblower protections, it would seem logical that this guy was not in it alone.

"According to the ex-husband, the FBI told him that they knew he was involved." The FBI often knows things while knowing not much of anything, I believe anyway. Why would they tell him that? Have they ever named him an official person of interest or a suspect? Perhaps, that was a ploy to try...

It pretty easy to see why the note was sealed. The same reason information is sealed in ant criminal investigation, particularly if the criminal activity could involve other participants or there were details that may be used later to confirm facts.

I was just thinking about how many times I have thought that Law Enforcement "must have evidence that they are not sharing" because they seem singularly focused upon one and only one possible outcome. Only to find out many years later that they were completely wrong and could have solved he case...