Recent content by Ruthbullock

According to the hospital itself and the Thirlwall documents it was. They were understaffed throughout the time period. Firstly, the review is explicit that the neonatal service was not meeting required professional standards. It directly asks whether the service was compliant and answers: “Is...

DBM

“just before Letby was due to start her shift on 27 June 2016, she was called and told not to come into work. She was then moved into an administrative role.”...

The headline doesn’t read the same if they had focused on this quote out of the article they printed “Having mostly agreed with Dr Evans's conclusions, Bohin was called upon by the prosecution during the trial,” Dr Bohin doesn’t agree with all the conclusions of the international panel, or all...

The Thirlwall Inquiry is at the stage of being proofread for publication- this will take some time, but conclusions have obviously been reached and it has been wrapped up, aside from ensuring any remaining evidence referred to in the report has been uploaded. Once released do we think this...

It was the latter- a lot of posts just simply criticising the defence for using a PR team with no other substance. The reality is it’s a non point, PR teams are used by both sides and it is certainly not a way of judging either guilt or innocence. It’s just an action taken by various parties...

Pib Public record is the purpose and yes MPs are allowed to present and escalate all sorts of things on behalf of constituents- that’s how the system works- the MPs are there to represent “the people” in parliament.

My point was there are other PR teams involved in the case, I then corrected the statement as it wasn’t clear enough if people don’t open the articles. My point still stands- multiple PR teams have been involved, so it is not unusual and the defence team having one is no different to the...

Sorry, I will clarify- the families employed a PR team through their solicitors- I’m not sure what point you wanted to make.

So the defence have been heavily criticised on here for having a PR company to represent them and it has been stated by many as odd, unusual, uncalled for amongst other things, when all along the prosecution team also have a PR firm acting on the families behalf, which was providing press...

Again mum isn’t lying- but it’s not quite the full picture about CPAP- many people then went on to assume baby e had never been on CPAP “On July 30, she tells the court she was able to visit the twins in the neonatal unit, from upstairs in the post-natal wards. She said she was able to cuddle...

For those posters who believe mums testimony is 100% accurate and not affected by time- have a look at the Thirlwall statement, compare to the email about the actual birth to see that things may be misremembered. LANGDALE: And when were they both born, did they cry on delivery? How was it...

Where in the entire conversation have I accused the mother of lying, or even implied she lied? You want to convince people I have said the mother is lying because you dislike the fact that I don’t align to your POV. I provided the court reporting of what mum said occurred and accepted it as...

She didn’t you are correct- but she did do the technique she had been shown to calm her baby, whilst it was crying. It would be very unlikely mum would be attempting to calm her babies crying this way if she felt the crying was due to bleeding from the mouth, rather than just general distress...

The mum “Lucy Letby was "busy doing something, but she wasn't near Child E." She said she immediately went to Child E and used a 'containment technique' which she had been taught, to make him feel calmer, but "it didn't work". Child E "continued to make the same noise". She said she was...