Recent content by Ruthbullock

I do get it- but he knew he was in a high profile case and chose this action- he may have hoped it wouldn’t end up in the public domain, but that thought is pure naivety. Does it make any difference to whether what he shared in the trial is accurate or not, probably not- but he is an added cog...

So why did he choose not to allow the hearing to happen? It’s not as though he would have had to do anything at all apart from drag a union representative along for support to the hearing. There is no logical reason apart from guilt to not allow a process like a disciplinary procedure to...

But they don’t, why would they waste money when he’s withdrawn his registration and will never be allowed to practice again. There may well be private prosecutions occurring, or not with regards his practice- but that won’t be shared unless it ends up in court- which again is unlikely to happen...

From: GIBBS, John (COUNTESS OF CHESTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST) Sent: 24 February 2017 00:30 To: JAYARAM, Ravi (COUNTESS OF CHESTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST) Subject: Re: So.... Hi Ravi. - The review Anne Martyn and I undertook. Ian didn't tell me how many patients had been...

One could say the same about the judges summing up, or the fact the people are cherry picking only the prosecution reporting to share. I shared the defence transcript where Harkness under questioning admitted he was with baby e at 9.30. Somehow on here everyone is still agreeing he didn’t...

Instead of paraphrasing- perhaps quote from the reporting/trabscripts- he did originally say 10, but as I pasted earlier- he corrected this to 9.30. If Letby didn’t mention the bleed- and there is nothing to suggest she didn’t- why was his first action to look at and check the NG tube for blood?

DBM- duplicate

Th doctor didn’t seem at all concerned though- so whilst you are painting it as some dramatic emergency that required much quicker action by Letby- the actual action when the doctor saw the baby, as described in court, is below and the outcome was to carry on observing the baby and he left the...

Yes she did- his shift hadn’t yet started and unless it’s life and death, no one would call for a doctor during handover and prior to that handover the nurses were on there handover until 8.30 and it does fit with the mum visiting at 9.00. A lot of the evidence around child e just feels like...

These timings also fit with Dr Harkness stating in his Thirlwall witness statement that the baby had a sudden gastric bleed 30 minutes after his visit and recorded in his 11.00 notes- as the major gastric bleed was resolved by 11.00 to allow him to write up his notes...

So one of the Dr on shift has confirmed his handover shift start was at 9.00 and then he always went to the paediatric unit first until 10.00 before heading to the neonatal unit. He was called about attending to baby E and was on that ward by 9.30 and with baby e until 10.10 when he submitted...

According to the latest CCRC update there have been several submissions on several different aspects, including several expert reports are listed below The International Neonatal Expert Panel Report (Dr. Shoo Lee) - A 698-page report compiled by a 14-member international panel of neonatologists...

A rather large folder was submitted, amongst that was the Shoo Lee and colleagues report (with a much deeper analysis than was shared with the public). You are asking an impossible question- no one knows the full extent of what has been submitted to the CCRC- but that also includes yourself...

Just for your loyalty to the mail and it being your reporting of choice, they also printed an article: While the GMC conducted its probe during the trial, a medical tribunal ordered restrictions on Professor Hindmarsh's work. It said: ‘There is information to suggest he may pose a real risk to...

So what is your theory then about why he didn’t allow the GMC investigation to go ahead and clear his name. People don’t usually spend years becoming a doctor to lose that title at the end of their career due to a false accusation. I’ve shared what is now his public record on the GMC website...