Why is her barristers stance and actions so important to you that you now wish to encourage everybody to put in professional complaints about somebody? If what he was doing was so inappropriate- the CCRC would have said something by now, as would the many legal publications in the UK.
Because if the earlier timeline is accurate with regards the phone calls, the later deterioration and phone calls aren’t accurate- people seem to keep glazing over the fact that one or the other is wrong-. The only timeline that roughly fits (and it’s still not perfect) with the mums testimony...
Any chance you can hunt a link down for this? I have had a look and can’t find it, although that’s not to say it doesn’t exist- there’s just so much to search through.
The issue is it could easily be clarified since the trial by the police who still seem to want to share information and could easily clarify misinformation and it hasn’t been. So it may have been the accurate timings- in which case all the medical professionals notes were wrong, or the phone...
It started off as they were all paid, then they were just stupid/naive so spoke out. Now they have an axe to grind - which is it? You are not actually considering their points that may well be valid and open to discussion, rather you are coming up with nonsensical arguments as to why they...
They started fundraising in 2013 to build a new more appropriate and safe building- they wouldn’t have even considered spending money on this if it was even semi suitable for purpose
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-45814629.amp
I find it strange how posters manage to share all the insane garbage they claim is posted in forums (I will add with no links, so it really shouldn’t be shared on here as it is also not your opinion), whilst reading both innocent and guilty posts on a variety of mediums ( yep you lot have forced...
I am amazed this hasn’t been posted here yet- charged with voyeurism (which reminds me of the escalation of Libby Squire)- ignoring the child offences
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/36832793/claudia-lawrence-cop-charged/
I have sadly almost given up on this forum as to the usual quality of conversation we have on web sleuths - as the saying goes “you can’t argue with stupid”. I don’t think any one person who is posting is stupid, but the posts lack any substance or even any information to discuss and contradict...
Baby 15
The court initially heard that the boy, a triplet, had suffered blunt trauma to the abdomen, causing purpling of the skin and bleeding on the liver. Air was allegedly injected into the nasogastric tube causing the intestines to swell. Later, the accusation was changed to deliberate...
So first it’s a management cover up, now it’s the coroner not doing a good enough job. Your evidence to support this is lacking any effort to substantiate your claims from the trial, that has since had a lot of things questioned through an inquiry (that never made any attempt to exonerate her...
Just for clarity, I know the answer- they were specialists brought in after the fact and weren’t actually on the shop floor at the time, yet you frame someone’s guilt using second hand accounts and have no first hand accounts to dispute someone else’s second hand account.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.