Recent content by Sage1
-
S
GUILTY Australia - Jill Meagher, 29, Melbourne, 22 Sep 2012 #4
Does this mean his DNA had never been cross-checked previously, or not on file until now? I am working on the assumption that all DNA samples are cross-checked wherever the offender/s is unknown but where DNA has been collected.- Sage1
- Post #991
- Forum: Recently Sentenced and Beyond
-
S
GUILTY Australia - Jill Meagher, 29, Melbourne, 22 Sep 2012 #4
My apologies but I meant to have added that I thought at the time that "it could have been me or someone I knew" in the cases of Deborah Linsley and Rachel Nickell.- Sage1
- Post #972
- Forum: Recently Sentenced and Beyond
-
S
GUILTY Australia - Jill Meagher, 29, Melbourne, 22 Sep 2012 #4
Thank you Perthite. That makes sense to me now. I have only seen them being whirled about and that's terrifying.- Sage1
- Post #971
- Forum: Recently Sentenced and Beyond
-
S
GUILTY Australia - Jill Meagher, 29, Melbourne, 22 Sep 2012 #4
Hi all. I'm a newbie here. I've been lurking for a while trying to make sense of of it all. It is a little late, sorry, but I have some information regarding the nurse that I've not seen mentioned on the threads. First, may I offer my deepest sympathy to Tom and Jill's family. Even though I...- Sage1
- Post #969
- Forum: Recently Sentenced and Beyond
Online statistics
- Members online
- 98
- Guests online
- 2,322
- Total visitors
- 2,420