Recent content by Sauerkraut2

  1. S

    Television Coverage of Phoebe

    Irish television station TV3 aired a documentary last night. Here it is (or you can read it on my site). MEGAVIDEO - I'm watching it
  2. S

    Websleuthing

    Fluffy is getting the spanking she deserves for posting rank rumor and other items which have no basis in fact. Her claims of having overheard EMT's discuss intimate details of their call are incredible and unbelievable. She made all that up, imho, and is backtracking so quickly that she's...
  3. S

    Photos Thread

    On the masslive site, CF2 posted a link to a picture of Sullivan and Broderick with an unidentified 3rd girl; look quickly because more posts get deleted than stay up.
  4. S

    Indictments and Charges

    Jenny, dear... the DA did not bring the charges; the grand jury did. The can throwing is a charge for which Longe specifically is charged. A local reporter is trying to follow up on the specific meaning of the civil rights charges but has yet to get a response from the DA's office. I...
  5. S

    Television Coverage of Phoebe

    And NECN. Shelburne did a telling interview of a babbling Sayer.
  6. S

    Television Coverage of Phoebe

    Her picture is gone. So is the feature which causes the person's name to show up when you click on the picture.
  7. S

    Cutting

    Supposedly is the key phrase... it is something fluffy is trying to pass off as truth because she has all this inside info she's getting as a member of the anti-bullying task force. I suspect she's full of... gossip... because no school official would risk losing their teaching license due...
  8. S

    Cutting

    The question in my mind when I read those parts in the indictment documents was: why did the DA not charge them with unlawful restraint/kidnapping?
  9. S

    Exactly WHAT about Phoebe could set them "free?"

    If you mean the crap some idiot named "danny bloom" is spamming all over the internet, do not believe it. I've read his scribblings - some of which were put into the spam bucket on my blog - and what he presents as "truth" is just him vying for attention.
  10. S

    Indictments and Charges

    No. And I get no answer when I ask for a release date. There's a reason it's not public record or subject to public release; I suspect it has to do with the sex-by-minor and privacy issues.
  11. S

    Exactly WHAT about Phoebe could set them "free?"

    Hearsay is like the 1st Amendment... not absolute and subject to exceptions. I wouldn't worry too much about testimony - public vs private - because the risk of going to jail for perjury will rest heavy on their feeble little minds. The defense attorneys will have no choice but to go heavy...

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
58
Guests online
1,520
Total visitors
1,578

Forum statistics

Threads
636,295
Messages
18,694,111
Members
243,598
Latest member
FIGGgirl413
Back
Top