Recent content by scipio_usmc

You have things backwards. There was no rush on the part of the insurance company. The insurance company made a standard nuisance settlement offer because the cost of litigation would cost more than to settle. It was Steven Avery who was in a rush to settle. The only discovery left was to...

Supporters of Steven Avery consistently ignore his lies, changing accounts and how he initially tried to hide his connection to the appointment. In the past Steven Avery did one of 3 things when arranging appointments. He either: 1) Called Auto Trader and provided his own name, address and...

<modsnip> Avery was convicted because of a mountain of evidence and the only way for him to be innocent is if things that never even occurred in crazy movies What it would take for Steven Avery to be innocent had occurred here.

First some background. People keep saying the police had it out for Steven Avery and hated him. The reason Steven Avery was known to police at all was because of a kidnapping he committed. Steven Avery was already a convicted felon and thus not allowed to possess a firearm when a woman accused...

I am a civil attorney and the lawsuit was a civil lawsuit not a criminal case where they were trying to overturn a verdict. The lawsuit had no merit it was simply worth nuisance value to settle and that is why it was settled. The thrust of the suit was that they were negligent in not figuring...

The issue is what the state where Avery Salvage was operating does. They require the vin being reported when Avery Salvage sold the scrap. Had he scrapped her vehicle his brothers would have reported the VIN when they sold the metal scrap and he would have been toast because they sure as hell...

His step father didn't even know Halbach or know she was coming there. Moreover he spent the evening with Barb.

1) Someone had to be stalking Halbach and would have had to follow her after she left Avery's property, ran her off the road, kidnapped her leaving her vehicle where she run off the road and took her someplace else to rape and kill her. 2) The person would have to have killed Halbach and...

All claims of evidence being planted were rubbish. Hence nothing to punish.

Totally false. The lawsuit involved his conviction not what Colborn or other police who had nothing to do with his conviction did after. You obviously never read the lawsuit.

The 4 different allegations are: 1) police were personally on the hook for wrongdoing and had to make the lawsuit go away to avoid personal legal liability from a judgment issued against them 2) that the police engaged in wrongdoing and lawsuit would have revealed their wrongdoing had it...

There was no criminal malfeasance. Moreover the people being sued no longer worked for the government so were not involved in the Halbach investigation.

Well the claim they edited his testimony in an effort to try to make people suspect he was dirty and planted evidence is obviously true on its face. Al you have to do is compare the actual testimony to the doctored testimony. The very things they doctored are what truthers routinely seize upon...

MAM is a propaganda piece that misrepresents in an effort to create doubt. It accomplishes the intended goal of getting some to doubt the verdict but the basis for that doubt has no ability to legally warrant reversing the conviction. MAM covered Steven Avery's trial and presented it in a...

A new trial based on what? What matters is whether the jury was convinced of his guilt not you. People are not entitled to a new trial just because select people don't agree with the jury. You have to articulate a legal basis for a new trial in order to obtain one. To date no one has close to...