Recent content by shultz

I'm coming in late on this one, but is anyone considering the mum? She's potentially on drugs, had William taken off her by the department and potentially is not the most law abiding citizen. The circumstances of the abduction suggest someone who knew the grandmother's home quite well and who...

We need some closure on this thread. Can all of the contributors who got it plain wrong, please come forward, admit the mistake and apologise to GT.

Seems like he's moving on with his life. Good on him. After the terrible media circus, one can only imagine how bad it would have been for GT. I hope he's making something of himself.

Yeah, maybe that's why Gable Tostee is so messed up. <modsnip>

There's no disdain, both the income earner and the parent have an equally important role in society. Oh, I forgot, the joy of child raising is considered 'oppression.'

Source? Statistically, his father probably brought in the wealth and high earnings, but I accept it's his family's money as his parent's likely both contributed equally in their natural gender roles.

He's innocent. He hasn't done anything wrong. He won the case - in any other jurisdiction he'd get indemnity costs. This would have cost him $200,000 at least. His father deserves to recoup some of his retirement fund.

Yes, because he hasn't done anything wrong.

This is bizarre.

Spot on Colleague. Victory at last. A victory for justice. I personally congratulated GT.

So she's allowed to act completely irrationally but GT is expected to act in the most logical and thoughtful of ways?

Because we have a legal right to defend our homes.

This is now becoming excruciatingly painful. I reckon one jury member reckons they're Sherlock Holmes.

The prosecution knows it has no case. It's hoping to convict on emotion and moral culpability alone. You think the prosecution doesn't know and rely on 'The Courier Mail' effect?

They key is 'unlawful' - the same reason the self defence argument gets him off.