Recent content by snoopydoo

  1. S

    What Is the Defense Strategy #2

    I'm guessing they'll paint Jesse Grund as the 'real' Zenaida.
  2. S

    2010.10.08 - MISTY's St. Johns Co. FELONY SENTENCING @1:30PM (secret witness?)

    Twenty-five years seems just a tad draconian, IMO. There's just a degree of difference between 'illegal' drug abuse, prescription addicts and alcohol abuse and druggies like her are just selling to use. Throwing the key away with someone her age and with her upbringing says more about us as a...
  3. S

    If Misty tells the truth...

    Grand Jury subpoena, maybe?
  4. S

    2010.09.27 - Issues with JVM discussing bombshell developments in Haleigh Case

    Thanks, but I wonder if it's enough. I'm thinking they would need some corroborating evidence or testimony to charge and/or convict him. The thing is, SA probably had enough to get a Grand Jury indictment for Joe just based on Misty and Tommy's testimony alone, yet they didn't. And they...
  5. S

    2010.09.27 - Issues with JVM discussing bombshell developments in Haleigh Case

    The main problem I have with the RC involvement theory is that most of it is based on how he acted and reacted. However, along with being guilty/involved his actions and reactions could just as well be explained if he has a psychological disorder. A sociopath/psychopath doesn't react...
  6. S

    2010.09.27 - Issues with JVM discussing bombshell developments in Haleigh Case

    Yeah, and then there's the question of where he got the drugs. If it's true that RC had a stash and RC did call ToC to go check on MC and she wasn't home or passed out…
  7. S

    2010.09.27 - Issues with JVM discussing bombshell developments in Haleigh Case

    Yeah, that does seem to be quite a stretch. I rather prefer the hypothesis you put forth in another thread regarding ToC. -Tommy put himself at the MH early in the evening at RC's behest. -Tommy put himself at the MH when the child was abducted. -Tommy put himself at the disposal site...
  8. S

    2010.05.13 Prosecution lists Aggravating Factors

    {sorry for the poor snipping skills. Mine in italics, yours in bold.} It would be an act of bad faith on behalf of the SA if they filed an intent not to pursue the DP, then went on to seek the DP, without anything of additional evidentiary value coming forth. They said as much in the DP...
  9. S

    2010.05.13 Prosecution lists Aggravating Factors

    I don't imagine the defense wants to fight the big picture, circumstantial case. The case the defense would like to fight is the one the SA laid out when the prosecutor stood up in open court describing how Casey placed the duct tape over Caylee's mouth and nose while she was looking up into the...
  10. S

    2010.05.13 Prosecution lists Aggravating Factors

    Lyon's position is that the prosecution is overcharging the case, essentially claiming that aggravating factors (i), (l) and (m) were already known when the State decided not to pursue the DP. By the facts then known, without a body the State couldn't determine (d) and (h). The defense is...
  11. S

    2010.05.13 Prosecution lists Aggravating Factors

    I think it's all tied in with the ME's unknown cause of death.
  12. S

    2010.05.13 Prosecution lists Aggravating Factors

    I'm expecting the Judge to have a problem with the words may and argue. "the state will list ... the aggravating factors that it intends to prove." JP didn't order the State to list the aggravating factors it may argue. I hardly think anyone, including JP, would deem intends to prove...
  13. S

    2010.05.08 Since January do you see forward movement in the Investigation of Haleigh

    They (LE) might be coming at this from a different angle. If it can be established Haleigh is dead, or declared so, I'm wondering if RC and/or MC can be found culpable in a round about way through negligence. From the Florida statutes (my bold)...
  14. S

    Potential Pros Problems and an NG Verdict #2 **LIST ONLY NO DISCUSSION**

    I'm just envisioning the following type of scenario playing out with each State witness on cross, over and over, throughout the trial: Defense: so LE why didn't you search the wooded area that was the nearest opportune place to dispose of the body? LE: because it was under water. D: so why...

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
42
Guests online
1,284
Total visitors
1,326

Forum statistics

Threads
636,705
Messages
18,702,111
Members
243,837
Latest member
iamthewalrus655
Back
Top