Recent content by Spongy123

I believe the DNA will solve a lot of the mystery here.it is so versatile. Not only can it identify who a person was, but it can identify relationships. I mean mitochondrial dna can stay the same for centuries. So i think of there is a living or dead relative out there in some database...

It may be hard to track that kind of abuse unless they can trace it in bones. Since the toddler was completely decomposed when recovered, the only way to trace it would be in the marrow. I am not sure if this could be done .

I used to work the jewelry counter at K Mart some years ago, and the jewelry looks like something we may have sold. Cheap, no obvious manufacturer trademarks. I think if Peaches bought this set for her and her daughter, she probably purchased it from a place like K Mart, and it would have been...

She has a cousin on facebook.

I find a missing persons case involving equilla hodrick interesting. She was age 8 when she went missing in 1985. She is fair skinned like peaches, and she would have been about 20 years old in 1997. A lot of girls are trafficked into the sex trade. God only knows if equilla hodrick has any dna...

My understanding, correct me if I am wrong, is that Peaches found in June of 1997 is the mother of the unidentified toddler who's remains were found in 2011. The torso found in 1997 was estimated to be about three days deceased. If we assume that mother and child were killed at the same time...