Recent content by SweetCaramels

What was his analysis?

Upon recognizing her handwriting, wouldn't he have questioned her on JB's whereabouts?

He mentioned the fruit cocktail inthe suit against Spitzer as well.

Yes, if he said he is waiting for further testing to confirm his suspicions and then prosecute, that would seem to indicate JDI. Though I suppose it is still possible Burke bashed her head and John did the strangling.

Yeah, I don't think that qualifies as lying or misleading. who doesn't inadvertently mix up pronouns

I have always found him to be a intelligent kid. But that particular comment of his never struck me as being telling from a 9 year old. I would think they know secrets aren't meant to be told.

What is so odd about what he said?

I guess not unless it was determined the murder was committed during the sexual abuse. Otherwise it would seem like some kind of intent is required.

I concur. Although luck and money helped them a lot, they did show shrewdness in recognizing trick questions and answered them accordingly.

The fact both JonBenet and Burke were regularly wetting the bed at six and nine years old points to "some trauma, some stress, some anxiety" in the house, adds Ms Wilson. The above quote is also from the book. But apparently John's kids from his first marriage were also bedwetters at those ages.

Thanks, very interesting. It does however seem contradictory to me that a child could be found to have committed first degree murder which requires a strong level of intent yet not be capable of being charged. * In the case of theft I can see how one can determine a theft has occurred but that...