It's hard to believe (in fact to me it's outright impossible to believe) that whoever interacted with her even briefly on campus has not heard about her disappearance at some point in the 22 years since.
Yes I am familiar with that person, I know exactly who that is. There is no evidence of anything though, only a lot of stories that have been repeated for ages without much substance.
This seems like a typical anniversary article designed to fool people into thinking a lot is going on behind closed doors when in fact nothing is happening. For them to use new technology, they would have to have DNA, a crime scene, a direct witness, a confession and they have none of that.
The drug debt angle is certainly suspicious because how are you supposed to collect money from a deceased person? We had all kinds of numbers given over the years, none of which were realistic for a 17 year old to have accumulated in terms of debt. I would lean more towards her seeing something...
I don't have a definitive theory to give you or anyone, my belief has always been that it's drug related. How exactly I don't know, it's not necessarily up to me to find out. It seems like nobody has been able to find that out in the last 22 years.
No one is ever confirmed deceased unless a body or human remains are found or the family of the missing person decides to have them legally declared dead.
I don't know that it's ever definitively been determined that there was no footprints leading into the woods especially since there were no searches into the woods until many days after the disappearance.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.