It's ridiculous that they need to re-listen to all this testimony. Like where were they during this, sleeping? This is not even a major part of the case, this is what happened after the fact.
But justice is about getting the right conviction, not just getting one for the sake of getting one. Can't let people make decisions based on emotions...that's when people make the worst decisions.
We also know he was annoyed that they were already so late. Going for a half an hour drive and knowing you have to do another half hour to come back is very long. And even if it were possible...if you're sitting in the passenger seat watching this guy drive would you not get bored out of your...
The thing is I don't think the crown is any more genuine than Smich's lawyer when they bring up Bosma as if they are looking for justice for him. The crown is looking for convictions and using an emotional appeal to work on the jury...I don't think it's any other reason. I don't think any side...
Not without attracting bosmas attention. Why a minute or two in the drive would be already need to be stopping for no reason. He could stop anywhere, but not without alerting bosma
Sent from my LG-H812 using Tapatalk
Smich could have moved to the middle easily and shot towards the passenger side. Millard would have to shoot while driving or while at an intersection where there might be witnesses. From Trinity road the first stop or intersection is Wilson street so if he suddenly stops for no reason before...
It is circumstantial of course, you could say none of the cars are it, perhaps one, or all three. But when you combine this with the testimony of the neighbour walking his dog giving a timeframe of 915-930 those timestamps work and that's just too many coincidences for me to believe especially...
To me, #2 is all that is needed. It proves #3 and doesn't require #1. Combine that with going straight to the incinerator and I don't have much to second guess.
And really, do we know for sure Millard was the driver? Millard could have gone up on the stand and told the exact reverse of Smich's...
I think the difference amounts to you just have a lower requirement for reasonable doubt. And the problem is that requirement will be different from person to person. I can see a scenario where Smich doesn't know what's about to go down, but helps his buddy clean up because he feels like he's...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.