Folks, I haven't been following this case in depth for very long, so forgive me if this has been addressed - but where is this attorney getting his money?
1- Simply put, in this context, the Judge would make a ruling on whether or not the information sought to be obtained would result in the Anthonys incriminating themselves and thus afforded the protection of the 5th Amendment. Such a ruling obviously rests on some relatively complex legal...
All questions will be "allowed."
The defense may object to a question, but unless the answer would divulge privileged information or unless the Anthonys plead the 5th then she/he will have to answer.
And even if they plead the 5th the plaintiffs may ask the judge to make a ruling on that.