The jury are going to be feeling fleeced today. Child-free was one of the only pieces of evidence so far that promoted the 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 to a murdering 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 and now it's gone. The prosecution have been knocked back down the ladder and have to start climbing all over again. He's an even more loving...
The prosecution can threaten the court with an appeal but that doesn't mean it has any legal veracity.
The court needed to sentence on the facts found by the courts which remain from the original judgement.
But how did she ignore the SCA?
She sentenced for the same incident but for DE rather than CH. The previous sentence was for CH bordering on DE and now it's DE.
Why would we expect a big change in the jail time?
The 15 years is a minimum unless there are particular circumstances in...
From the SCA judgement: "Thus not only did he not know who was behind the door, he did not know whether that person in fact constituted any threat to him."
So you are not correct. The SCA determined that he did not know it was Reeva behind the door.
I did see it as a list of points and had a scenario in mind at one point but now I'm not sure.
No one heard an argument and the prosecution had no evidence of one.
The screaming of a woman had me convinced for a while that it could only have been DV murder. I had dismissed EVDM's evidence...