Agree with general observations, having spent a decent amount of time in MS and LA, but his hands don't seem to be those of a construction worker, except for perhaps an electrician or instrument worker...?
Respectfully...."Au contraire, mon frere"...(to the otherwise, my friend)...
Don't get me wrong about feeling how 'smarmy' the defense was, but if you're going to be a defense lawyer, and not get it over-turned, you have to work with what you've got...
They have less than a ZERO to work...
Please let us be kind on the 'wheelchair' or 'cane' thing...
Lots of people use them as necessary, they don't like them, they don't want them, but at times they need them...
If mental issues could be so visible, we'd be baffled beyond belief...
Wild guess, but if I was juror, or jury foreman, I would not want to make a final verdict without "sleeping on it"...
Thinking they are in consensus, want to sleep on it, and come in refreshed, review it, and deliver verdict...
In all fairness, just have to see what they (the DT) say...
Would not want to be in their position, no way, no how...
But they have a job to do, and if they don't do it well (however one may define that) it may lead to issues down the road (assuming the case goes as 'everyone thinks it...
Just have to say this...
The O.J. thing was 'blown' over the glove...which is ridiculous...any golfers before the era of 'synthetic' gloves, know they were shrunk and shriveled to the size of a wadded up Kleenex, but eventually you could still wiggle your hand in there...:rockon:..the...
Ok...so I'll 'fess up front that I'm not the world's most patient person...
But what in the world is the point of calling this 'expert' up ??
He is talking psycho-babble...has no bearing on the case...
And if I was a juror, smoke would be coming out of my ears at this bumbling 'expert'...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.