Recent content by Valiant

Unfortunately the video of him chatting with a friend about an hour before he left sure looks like more than an energy drink was involved. https://www.fox7austin.com/video/1023461

I think is possible the prank calls were related. Say the women were abducted for non-sexual reasons. Those prank calls put the thoughts right back to a sexually motivated crime. I personally am not convinced this was a sexually motivated event. It could have been, it could be something else.

One of the workers, a neighbor, a random person ( or acquaintance) who left their car nearby, anyone who needed to get to that neighborhood. But yeah this makes a worker seem a real possibility.

And that’s why good defense lawyers never ask their client if they are guilty or even for full details. Just enough detail to build doubt in a jury’s thoughts.

Sometimes things are just unfortunate accidents. How sad for his family and friends no matter what.

When I read about how everything was placed at the scene, I think there is one possibility that's been overlooked. He's riding along on his bike and sees something, even in the dark. He stops the bike and grabs his gun and is off after the target. I've known hunters like that. But this still...

There is also an outside chance that the person seen only moved the car. If there was a DNA hit from the car, that would give any good defense attorney an opening to say "My client only moved the car. They had no idea the car was involved in any other crime. No, they can't remember who asked...

I think there’s a very simple reason no one has been arrested. When there are many people in that house with possible access to that car, you can’t rush in and arrest someone without strong evidence. Had there only been one person in the house, and only that person had access to the car, it...

Agreed. There are lots of pictures of him beside a picture of a car online - but none of the cars match the description.

The hope is when person A is called before the Grand Jury they decide to spill the dirty on Person B rather than taking the Fifth. That's when deals often get made. Let the small fish go to catch the bigger one.

Unless someone heard them talking or overheard a phone call with their changed plans. Then someone else knew where they’d be. I don’t think we can logically determine which one or ones were the target. They could all have been targeted.

I still think it's possible no one was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Consider that there are lots of people around at the parties and there may have been discussion about the possible criminal cases coming up. All it would take is someone talking with or overhearing a discussion about...

And guilty of First Degree Murder and Arson. (same link as above, now updated) https://www.latrobebulletinnews.com/news/local/jury-deliberates-in-missing-unity-woman-homicide-trial-after-closing-statements/article_4a82f2b4-f624-4b8d-8896-20d3d10a7920.html

I hate to be gruesome, but if something happened to Eli inside the apartment I think the perp would have left the body in the fire. This all really has me puzzled and I think whatever happened to Eli was in another place. Why the perp went to (or returned to) the apartment to destroy evidence is...

The park isn't fenced off despite the appearance the gateway might give. You can really exist the park from the majority of the park's perimeter.