Also, if he had literally disposed of the body in a river, it would have cast doubt on the forensic evidence of bone being found in MB's cottage.
And I suspect there was a worry that some of the jury could have reacted negatively to a priest revealing this disclosure. Even though it was not...
Sentencing to follow this afternoon - it'll be a life sentence, quite possibly without parole ("whole life tariff") given that he was also found guilty of abduction.
Read back through the last few pages of messages. :fence:
My own view (and I dare say that of quite a few others who have followed the trial) is a feeling that he is guilty, but a fear that there may not be enough evidence to convince a jury to convict.
No, but I agree with Clutchbag that if there was any evidence there, it would more than likely been washed off while driving around in the rain and mud.
And of course the police have not helped in admitting that, due to "confusion" they had not examined the road where MB claimed he had...
It is just as well that there is some forensic evidence, because I don't think a jury would be willing to convict on the evidence of a 7 year-old who admitted to making some things up.
I don't think that the young witness's claim that April got into the vehicle on the driver's side was made public until the next day. Even then, the police were saying that this could have been because April "had got in with the driver or that it is left hand drive vehicle".
In other words...
If the jury cannot agree on a unanimous verdict, the judge may be willing to accept a majority verdict of 10 from the jury of 12. If the jury cannot reach a verdict one way or the other, there would have to be a re-trial with a new jury.
There are factual reports of the court proceedings, although it is not the main story in the news. There is no discussion as such because, as has been mentioned, the case is ongoing.