Recent content by WickedLester

Right so there are no definitive facts one way or the other. It's possible that they have a strong POI and are building the case, it's possible that they are at square 1, and its possible that they are somewhere in between.

can you offer any proof that they do not?

In my view that is a narrow interpretation of LE statements, actions, and inactions.

The evidentiary bar of convicting someone of first degree murder is very high (as it should be). Before you can name/arrest a suspect you need assurance you can convict. There is time/evidence needed to build the case. Maybe be an arrest will never happen. My assessment is based on my...

Sure they can. Need to make sure they can convict.

this forum is 55,000 posts of mostly speculation. Its interpretation of the evidence, LE actions/inactions, etc.

LE has their suspect. Just need to prove it.

Pretty clear that either one of two things is true: 1. Case is dead cold. 2. LE knows with high degree of certainty who did it but does not have enough evidence to arrest. I'm with option 2. I can't see them scaling back and stopping the publicity so soon without a suspect. Even so...

I think if they had evidence of a second perp they would say so. To not would mean that someone might dismiss a suspect that if they did not resemble BG.

Agreed.

Agreed. Only thing accomplished by naming suspect is giving a defense attorney fodder to say the client was targeted by police and they didn't look elsewhere.

IDK. With a heinous crime like this I have a hard time believing that LE would go so silent if they still needed tips.

I've always felt one killer based on evidence but I do find it an odd choice of words when LE said BG "participated" in the murders.

Agreed. Seems to me they don't have video of him speaking so they can't be sure. But if they had 2 voices they would know 2 🤬🤬🤬'.

Been reported and discussed ad nauseum.