Recent content by YachtClassic007

we can discuss/guess what ever we like on the LF search ... but it really is simple .... until the police find the waste from Greggs, they have not found the contents of the bin which they think Corrie might be have been in ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

EXACTLY !!! you have summed it up to perfection .. Best of all, these band wagon jumpers haven't actually checked on the facts of the case before commenting ...

It may have been 'practically inconceivable' IN THE EYES of this ex HSE Invesitigator, but 11kg was the norm for the period stretching back over, I believe 18 months. Yes, it is an improbable weight for general refuge, but that weight has been quoted for the Greggs recycling bin. Greggs...

I like reading your posts Shire, they are always well written, thought about, factual and thought provoking ... and I have to agree totally with you, why are they so sure that C is in landfill. I do understand that the police can not release all info, but so many discussions on here just going...

ABSOLUTELY SPOT ON !!! This was never a case of anyone deliberately recording the data incorrectly. It was a case of the interpretation of the data being wrong. My only surprise would be that a figure of 110kg would stand out in a column (going back over 6 months) of 10-15kgs ... but again, as...

never came forward for over six months ... fact !!!!!

The only thing i can think of is that the TRUE ORIGINAL weight was electronically regsitered, and no single human got to see that figure, until someone in the office sees that figure and thinks ... what ???? no can't be right ... but then surely that someone knew the bin was weighed at 100kgs...

that is what is strange, bordering on suspicious ..... the person who recorded the CORRECT weight, never came forward to say .. hang on a minute, the weight wasn't 11kg ... that is bizarre ....

Doubt about the 11kgs ????? for seven months prior to this, that was a totally normal figure !!!!!!!!!!!!! so when the police were given the figures, they accepted it as the norm !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!l what was wrong was that someone in possession of the TRUE weight discounted it as being...

Miss French ... I am glad to find that I am not the only one that thinks with my head rather than my heart !! well written

I don't think the weight given to the police was an average. I also don't think it was as complicated as which payment/account method the customer was on. I think as a matter of procedure the bins were weighed. It was then up to someone in the 'office' to use the info. An account where a fixed...

In fact, the more i think of that last option, the more i think that is probably what happened. The weight was recorded as 100kg, maybe on paper .... and then when that was added to a database, someone thought .. 100kg ????????? that can't be right ....

I think it really is down to either .. the actual weight being written down in the incorrect box, or the incorrect box being read ... or ... a late thought ... someone did record it as 100kg and when that info was transferred to maybe a database, someone went ' 100kg ????????? no way ,,, its...

I think their thought process was quite simple .. We can find no evidence of him leaving on foot ... We have evidence of his phone moving at vehicular speed ... A bin lorry left the HS and headed in the direction of the Landfill as did his phone .. So just in case C and/or the phone were in the...

I think we are doing exactly what BIFFA did, interpret the facts incorrectly. There is no mention of the weight being wrong, calibration being wrong. Clearly from the fact they know the actual weight of the bin, that the calibration/weight recording was correct. Because the weight of the bin was...