Recent content by yycpaul

  1. Y

    GUILTY Canada - Taliyah Marsman, 5, & Sara Baillie, 34, Calgary, 11 July 2016 #2

    I am fully aware and agree 1. of the three basic principles that apply to all child support applications 2. granting the variation of a child support order is extremely common (fixing a mistake by a previous judge is uncommon ei. bad faith) What is uncommon or beyond any reasonable...
  2. Y

    GUILTY Canada - Taliyah Marsman, 5, & Sara Baillie, 34, Calgary, 11 July 2016 #2

    Section 3 loss as a percentage $707 - $425 = ($282) monthly = $3384 year divide $282 into $707 =.3988 round up you get percentage of 40 $19272 guideline income in 2014 divided into 12 month = $1606 monthly 1/5 = 0.2 0.2 X 19272 = $3854.40 year $707 = 44% guideline monthly income
  3. Y

    GUILTY Canada - Taliyah Marsman, 5, & Sara Baillie, 34, Calgary, 11 July 2016 #2

    Otto, I personally enjoy reading your detective solving theories. Your analytical skills are out of the box, creative, sometimes personalized, and often more tasteful than critics give you credit. While you continue to entertain me, I fear someone reading our comments might not seek help or...
  4. Y

    GUILTY Canada - Taliyah Marsman, 5, & Sara Baillie, 34, Calgary, 11 July 2016 #2

    "Just because the original order was drafted by a different judge at a different time does not preclude the original figures from having been erroneous? " This is why the court requires parties to file their last 3 years of income tax documents when dealing with support issues. " If it was...
  5. Y

    GUILTY Canada - Taliyah Marsman, 5, & Sara Baillie, 34, Calgary, 11 July 2016 #2

    Does anyone have the link to where global downloads entire documents? They had expired domestic document posted but I am unable to locate. Is it possible that in the past when the original support order was made, based on the $81894, it was based on incorrect income figures for whatever...
  6. Y

    GUILTY Canada - Taliyah Marsman, 5, & Sara Baillie, 34, Calgary, 11 July 2016 #2

    It is not common for a judge to reduce section 3 monthly support by almost 40% It is not common for an interm order to nul and void arrears. It is not common to reimburse section 7 after mother pays in full It is not common for section 7 not to include recreation, prescriptions, vision care...
  7. Y

    GUILTY Canada - Taliyah Marsman, 5, & Sara Baillie, 34, Calgary, 11 July 2016 #2

    In the vast majority of cases imputing of income by judges is used to make child supports payments higher.... according to document pages shown by CTV that was not the case. CM had 2014 income $81894 Imputed to $52164, $707 monthly suport changed to $425, and all previous orders were replaced...

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
106
Guests online
2,479
Total visitors
2,585

Forum statistics

Threads
632,154
Messages
18,622,738
Members
243,034
Latest member
RepresentingTheLBC
Back
Top