- Joined
- Oct 4, 2018
- Messages
- 12,092
- Reaction score
- 160,507
On an ice foggy night.Note, AT didn't even offer star-gazing as his alibi, just barfed it up as explanation for nocturnal commissions -- she might even produce a Polaroid of a star BK once saw -- but I don't think anybody believes he was star-gazing that night or on the nights of his Tour de Moscow loops. Whatcha doin' in Moscow, BK? The sky over Pullman has the same number of stars.
His alibi was weaker than even that. He liked early morning drives because in the past he's been known to stargaze.
(One wonders whether BK has worm out that alibi in the past, if ever he was caught hot prowling after dark? Who me? I'm not prowling. I'm stargazing. Why all the black? Why the mask? Well, that's how we stargaze in PA. I didn't know the rules were different here.)
I do want to point out, to AT, FWIW, 2, 3, 4 am isn't really 'early morning' to me. You know, as he's known for his 'early morning runs'. If say 2, 3, 4 am are the bewitching hours. If you're not up because of an alternate work schedule, fair chance you're going to get a side eye.
Why does BK always seem to be awake when other people are sleeping?
I daresay BK so far has the worst alibi I've ever heard. I was driving in my car, with my phone off.
JMO
I guess when defending a patently guilty person the burning trash from a dumpster at least feels warm for a while.
Honestly, what's left?I guess when defending a patently guilty person the burning trash from a dumpster at least feels warm for a while.
The model years were expanded to include models up to 2016 on 11/26.I will go against the grain and say I don't think the issue with the model years is completely conspiracy theory or completely made up on AT's part. Once the defense learned that IGG was involved, I think it's the job of the defense to make sure the suspect fit the facts, not the other way around. If they don't have the date the name was produced, they can't know for sure the model years weren't changed because that's what BK drove. It was pretty late in the game when they finally got that date. I don't think it's a Franks issue but just in general, I think it's a valid question.
JMO
RSBMHonestly, what's left?
RSBM
I do realize you’re referring to something else but jumping off this question…..
IMO? That final approval for the firing squad.
![]()
Bill to use firing squad as state's primary execution method advances to Idaho Senate floor
Sen. Doug Ricks, R-Rexburg, presented the bill, which he said would use a more effective method than lethal injection.www.ktvb.com
Right--we haven't really known for sure until the judge's orders yesterday that the years were expanded before the IGG produced the name. And the defense allegedly didn't know they were expanded before the IGG produced the name until they had the date the IGG produced the name. I'm glad the model years were extended before they had the name--it wasn't done because they knew what BK drove and it makes it a non-issue in my opinion.The model years were expanded to include models up to 2016 on 11/26.
Before public was informed of the BOLO for an Elantra.
Idaho murders: Bryan Kohberger changed license plate five days after student slayings | FOX 13 Tampa Bay
The suspect in the grisly murders of four University of Idaho students switched his license plate five days after his car was spotted near the crime scene, according to state records and a newly unsealed case filing.www.fox13news.com
I don't think we know they got that date late in the game. I can't imagine this wasn't immediately disclosed somewhere in discovery. I've followed countless cases where attorneys feign ignorance in order to put a certain narrative out there. In this case they wanted to make it appear that law enforcement reverse engineered this. There was a mountain of discovery, so they had plausible deniablity in regards to what the actual facts were.I will go against the grain and say I don't think the issue with the model years is completely conspiracy theory or completely made up on AT's part. Once the defense learned that IGG was involved, I think it's the job of the defense to make sure the suspect fit the facts, not the other way around. If they don't have the date the name was produced, they can't know for sure the model years weren't changed because that's what BK drove. It was pretty late in the game when they finally got that date. I don't think it's a Franks issue but just in general, I think it's a valid question.
JMO
"One of the University of Idaho students slaughtered in the November quadruple homicide had recently moved out of the home where the murders took place, but returned the day before the attack to see her former roommate and attend a party, her parents said.I don't think it was a vacuum either, JMO.
Due to the presence of his parents (and possibly his 2 sisters) and that the FBI knew BK regularly ran in the neighborhood, I think LE should have simply picked him up just after a run when he was tired and just before arriving back to his parents home. No need to terrorize his parents and damage their home. The parents did nothing wrong. JMO.
Dog Crate and KG's purse were both found inside of KG's new car according to Mrs. G. It is perplexing. Was KG getting ready to leave? Not sure. JMO.
Is Idaho different than other states? Or was the area much "safer"? I don't know anyone who leaves their purse in their car while they are sleeping inside. Not ever.
IMO, yes he will. He seems like the type who would try and match wits with the DA.Will BK try to take the stand and offer some sort of story?!
I think they said at one of the hearings they had just found out during the closed testimony what date the FBI gave the name to Moscow law enforcement--but I agree that's probably not the case. Blum reported in his book that the FBI had the name as early as 11 December and gave the name to Moscow 19 December. I'm sure they read the book lol. They had two competing arguments going on--that nothing was known before the IGG/name and that the IGG/name was known before the model of the car was changed. When the dates were revealed, one of those arguments was going to go down in flames.I don't think we know they got that date late in the game. I can't imagine this wasn't immediately disclosed somewhere in discovery. I've followed countless cases where attorneys feign ignorance in order to put a certain narrative out there. In this case they wanted to make it appear that law enforcement reverse engineered this. There was a mountain of discovery, so they had plausible deniablity in regards to what the actual facts were.
The whole point was to play to the cameras, and through that, influence the general public. We know they wanted those hearings broadcast, as it would allow them to throw out a bunch of misrepresentations to make the public question the official narrative.
That's why we heard about DNA magically growing (simply a part of the process, which they would know), about the car changing, etc.
Right--we haven't really known for sure until the judge's orders yesterday that the years were expanded before the IGG produced the name. And the defense allegedly didn't know they were expanded before the IGG produced the name until they had the date the IGG produced the name. I'm glad the model years were extended before they had the name--it wasn't done because they knew what BK drove and it makes it a non-issue in my opinion.
JMO
Catching up and typing this as I am on #12 out of 14...Not sure, but I still think we're in the dark regarding if it was actually Murphy barking? Hippler doesn't go into detail about the results of the inside/outside tests. Jmo guessing there were other dogs present in the immediate neighbourhood. Moo
Obviously, hence the "final approval" in my post as well as the article stating it’s in process. I never mentioned it being a done deal or remotely inferred it was worth a bet. It was an answer to a question of "what’s left" & nothing more. One thing is for sure - that legislation didn’t just come out of thin air on a whim. Regardless, we’ll see one way or another.The mitigation phase of the trial may result in ruling out the death penalty, and it isn't known if this bill will pass in the state legislature and if the governor will sign it into law. So premature to bet on this direction, IMO.