- Joined
- Jun 23, 2012
- Messages
- 5,048
- Reaction score
- 53,484
I have watched enough criminal cases over the years to know that there is no such thing as a slam dunk case. You never know when you are going to get that juror or two, in a trial, that just cannot seem to be able to grasp the concept of reasonable doubt, or a juror who may slip through the cracks, and onto a trial, who has some bias against law enforcement, or even one who does not understand forensic evidence, and zones out during testimony explaining it. Having said that, while this case, when it goes to trial, is expected to last about three months, I do not anticipate that it will take a jury very long to return a verdict of guilty of four counts of murder of the first degree. The defense will attempt to cast doubt on every piece of evidence that they can, but BK's DNA on the button of the bloody knife sheath will ultimately be a smoking gun that just cannot be explained away. I expect it may take the jury longer to decide the penalty phase than the guilt or innocence phase. JMO
Last edited: