- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 16,305
- Reaction score
- 270,212
And didn't AT insist that BK did a lot of driving in Moscow, just not "over there" and also with no stopping. So he wasn't shopping...Hypothetically, I suppose the defense could prove any shopping expeditions with BK's financials ie bank records, debit card receipts?. But ofcourse it might be argued BK paid cash, lol.
Then maybe defense could pull records of ATM withdrawals, but if they don't match the right times that may be less than useful. A pattern of paying by cash would need to be established imo and State might be able to produce evidence to counter that. Maybe BK is all old school and withdraws a wad of cash for his weekly or fortnightly shopping needs including semi regular 2am visits to Winco in Moscow.... ( Speculation).
Idk, whatever way one approaches it, the shopping angle looks weak to me. Trial should be interesting anyway. Hypothetically if defense was to introduce middle of the night shopping into the equation, I guess BK may have to testify if his defense can't produce receipts. So jmo I have a feeling this may not be part of the strategy. But who knows. Moo
I wager that he was, some of the time, driving "over there".
jmo