- Joined
- Jun 29, 2023
- Messages
- 785
- Reaction score
- 9,553
BBMI understand my phrasing came across that way, since we don't "know" each other. I'm not a true crime person. For some reason the Idaho 4 case grabbed my attention, and across hundreds of posts I've made on this forum about this case, I've been on the fence: Did BK really do it or not? It was very important to me to feel sure they had the right person and that there wasn't someone else out there, getting away with such a horrible crime.
There were many elements hinting to "yes", but the gag order meant a lot was under wraps. Iwastedspent so much time reading every court document, micro-analyzing every open hearing, watching various POV's in YouTube videos, researching store opening times, kbar knife makes and models, touch DNA transfer, IGG, and posting so many questions here, trying to make up my mind.
The info about the Amazon sheath replacement that came out in court convinced me, and if that had come out earlier I would have wasted less time sleuthing.
I hear you. This is the first and only case I’ve followed obsessively on Websleuths, but before that, I followed another case on Reddit and other SM that hits far closer to home.
The murder took place three hours from me and involved a love triangle. A boyfriend played psychological games with his live-in girlfriend, and she apparently snapped by murdering the other woman (who didn’t even realize she was the other woman).
I had a past boyfriend do the same thing to me, but I didn’t kill the other woman (or my ex), and I didn’t want to believe the accused woman was guilty.
And this woman definitely looked guilty, especially when federal agents captured her in Central America with a new face and dyed hair.
But I still (in hindsight, ridiculously) clung to the belief that the boyfriend —or possibly another man who seemed overly besotted with the much younger victim—could be the murderer.
I could stubbornly cling to this belief because the PC statement left room for doubt. It revealed no evidence that proved exactly when the murder took place, so the boyfriend could have done it. Plus, the accused woman’s defense attorney told Dateline’s Keith Morrison that his client had an alibi!
But the prosecution had the evidence all along that proved the accused was guilty and that her boyfriend was innocent (of murder, at least). They had a time-stamped audio recording of the murder (three gunshots), captured by a neighbor’s security camera! The boyfriend was talking on his cellphone at home, miles away at the exact time of the shooting, so he couldn’t have done it.
I was so angry. Why had I wasted my time reading all those Reddit and Twitter and Facebook posts? Why did that defense attorney tell a bald face lie to millions of people on Dateline, including potential jurors?
Anyway, that’s when I learned that PC statements don’t have to reveal all the evidence against a defendant, police don’t have to reveal why an alternative suspect (in my suspicious eyes) has been cleared, and defense attorneys will lie to try to get their clients off (at least on Dateline).
But I was now hooked on true crime, having learned my lessons.
So when the Snapchat video proved during trial that Alex Murdaugh was indeed present minutes before the brutal murders of his wife and son, I wasn’t shocked.
I was annoyed, though, and still am, that cases like Murdaugh and the present one sometimes go to trial when the prosecution has the goods on a defendant, but the defendant decides to roll the dice anyway and go to trial. At the cost of millions of Idaho tax payer dollars.
IMOO, of course.
Last edited: